blazebra

I’ve forgot slint. Same as QT

Currently I use WxWidgets and Cocoa for macOS.

The best would probably be pure native UI with static/dynamic library in Rust for logic. Sounds hard, but it’s the best option in my opinion.

My 2 cents is below. Your decision depends on your tasks, preferences and targets.

• GPU framework maybe fast, but accessibility at 0
• HTML backend is nice, but I can’t choice other than native, which limits me quite hard for target user base. And I don’t like JS if not strictly required (it’s a personal preference).
• GTK on macOS and windows is quite hard to install and I don’t like visuals
• QT is in grey zone if static (non-GPL project), and I haven’t found good way to bundle it if dynamic
• ImGUI is nice but I don’t know if they support HiDPI monitors and accessibility is not the highest
• fltk is nice, but 1) many things you’ll have to write by you own, rewriting sometimes from FLTK2 C++ code… and community could be more chill and friendly
• Windows Metro UI… probably no crates
• Win32 API GUI works perfect
• Swift… probably yes, but it’s very OS-dependent
• Cocoa — very nice for macOS.
• current stop is WxWidgets: small, embedded, look… ok for now.
• there’s some framework for iOS and Android, looks fine for me, but not my target ATM.

It makes sense if they hire middles, not seniors

It’s a good suggestion

Does it still work?

Integer sqrt can be used for integers with any length, not only for integers fit into f64

Integer sqrt is usually not a library function and it’s very easy to implement, just a few lines of code. Algorithm is well defined on Wikipedia you read a lot. And yes, it doesn’t use FPU at all and it’s quite fast even on i8086.

Algorithm is so plain and simple, it doesn’t require nightly or Rust specifically to implement.

Nice article, I enjoyed it. Why float sqrt has been used? Integer sqrt is way faster and easily supports integers of any lengths

Could you please explain why he should be embarrassed by such post? What would you improve?