sure some are formal
yeah. that would be some. now compare those three to the rest of the cast
brian
joined 2 years ago
but doesn't the twilight implementation sorta give you a bunch of counter points from your original argument?
like sure some of them are formal, but it's definitely not solely the 1800s aesthetic you had an issue with.
no its fine, they changed it with amendments. surely over the years they've had a bunch of changes
only 27 amendments
the 18th and 21st amendments just cancel each other out
the most recent amendment was 34 years ago, and was proposed in 1789
yep, amendments are keeping up with the times
careful, they might pull an android and somehow try and stop "sideloading" in windows
the heck is that body-sized blue fish-hook thing
I don't love that the headline as well as the first line of the article use the words "says" and "claims".
the jury ruled he was guilty. we're so far past "allegedly" and all that garbage. he did it. she was drugged. she was raped. there is no reason to be inferring any amount of doubt anymore.
not sure if you were being serious or something, but that's straight incorrect.
the one that makes me irrationally angry is the used car dealership advertising. like the decals are annoying, but the license plate covers/border things that people don't take off.
like do you really want to be advertising chuck and donna's used car emporium every time you drive your car?
if you make a π but then don't do the | then you get τ
while I sorta doubt you did the "math on the physics", my bigger worry is referring to .30-06 as 30.06, as one of those doesn't exist, as far as I'm aware.
but stating, factually, that there is "zero chance" of the bullet embedding in the collarbone, is pretty irresponsible. there are a multitude of other things that need to be accounted for in ballistics analysis, which even then can be misinterpreted.
view more: next ›
I don't get it.