caffinatedone

joined 1 year ago
[–] caffinatedone@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

Because they think that he will hurt people that they've been led to hate.

[–] caffinatedone@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

It shouldn't mean lower prices; deflation is bad, we just want a low rate of inflation. What we do want is for wages to outpace that, and for the past couple of years, they have for people at the lower end of the scale (which is also good)

[–] caffinatedone@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Fedora is the best thing ever to be in the world 🌎

[–] caffinatedone@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Of course, but I don't think that him as the VP candidate changes the odds of that much relative to the other contenders who don't come with that risk.

VP candidates don't usually matter much in an election unless they're freaks with a couch fetish or something weird like that.

[–] caffinatedone@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Assuming Harris wins, the first midterm federal election is usually ugly for the president's party, so it'd be a risk. Especially coming off of this election where dems will have to be extremely lucky just to hold onto the majority (even with the vp tiebreaker).

[–] caffinatedone@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Smart cars had to pass US crash test standards and have the appropriate safety equipment. The kei trucks that you can currently import and use are 25+ years old and wouldn't have even passed US standards back then. Your legs are the crumple zone in these things.

I assume that new ones would have a chance, but it'd be expensive for a manufacturer to modify and certify for the US market. Small cars haven't sold well here, and the profit margins are slim.

Maybe with the recent size and price increases in autos here, well see some movement. I'd love a modern Honda kei to go with my element.

[–] caffinatedone@lemmy.world 51 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They're not silly at all, they're thugs. They want to influence the next one by showing the cost of going against them.

Now, we're lucky that they're mostly grifting, incompetent, blustery cowards, so the risk isn't what it could be.

[–] caffinatedone@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Probably, but for other reasons. Neither of those are owned by the US, are they?

[–] caffinatedone@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

Not (re)building in areas prone to wildfires, mudslides, floods, and the like would be a good start. Otherwise, someone has to pay to rebuild when the ever more frequent disaster hits. State farm and other insurers suck in many ways, but this isn't unreasonable on their part.

[–] caffinatedone@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

The republican base isn't conservative in the modern sense, they're reactionary. In a similar vein, evangelical republicans don't support the people who embody the values that they profess to hold sacred, they fully, and loudly, back people who are quite the opposite.

I imagine that both groups feel that they're increasingly losing out in modern society and are seeking someone who'll crush their perceived enemies and return them to their rightful place ruling the rest of us. So, the allure of a strongman to return them to their imagined golden age.

[–] caffinatedone@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So, if they have a family and kids, I guess they're on the street now? The parent involved is likely going to prison, so they're not going to be able to provide support. This is "tough on crime" theater that would likely do nothing but cause more harm.

view more: next ›