cerevant

joined 1 year ago
[–] cerevant@lemm.ee 28 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Aside from the “well duh” factor, and the fact that this wasn’t even a secret, The demo had to happen long before it was ready to ship because the FCC filings were slated to go public and they didn’t want the world to find out about the phone from that source.

This wasn’t the demo of a defective unit shipped to customers, it was the demo of incomplete software and hardware. The reception of the first iPhone was overwhelmingly positive. So much so that Google abandoned their plans for Android being a BlackBerry knockoff.

[–] cerevant@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The whole thing boggles my mind. Keep in mind that a good number of “Pro” users are corporate types running PowerPoint and Excel but certainly wouldn’t stoop to using a consumer model.

[–] cerevant@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I’m not talking about interactions between instances, I’m talking about Google and Bing indexing Mastadon. That’s who we should be using for search.

[–] cerevant@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

When the rest of Hasbro’s business is tanking, they need to exploit the one property that is still making money.

[–] cerevant@lemm.ee 20 points 9 months ago

Sigh. Time for another round of patents that all say the same thing, except instead of “…but using the internet” they will be “…but using AI”.

[–] cerevant@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago (4 children)

No, you are disappointed that Mastadon doesn’t have the same feature set as Twitter. The fact that you can search off instance at all is impressive. What you are asking for is like saying you should find GM cars in Ford’s search bar. Each instance is its own website. Search engines are designed to do what you want, and as Mastadon grows in popularity, it’s search results will become more prominent.

[–] cerevant@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

If you can’t explain how the change makes the company more money, it isn’t enshitification.

[–] cerevant@lemm.ee 18 points 10 months ago

This is what is going to drive federated social media. Once marketing types can figure out that they won’t need to maintain 12 different social media presences and can host it on their own domain, they’ll gladly subsidize general purpose instances to make it easier for people to access their content.

[–] cerevant@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago

Store managed delivery/pickup seems to be growing since the pandemic. I think they discovered that the reduced theft and the ability to sell imperfect produce more than covers the cost of the system.

[–] cerevant@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

Store managed delivery/pickup seems to be growing since the pandemic. I think they discovered that the reduced theft and the ability to sell imperfect produce more than covers the cost of the system.

[–] cerevant@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Never said devs shouldn’t care about money. If you aren’t having fun maintaining some code, stop. If it is commercially interesting, you will probably be contacted. Charge for bug bounties. Prioritize features based on compensation. Start a foundation. There are lots of business models for OSS, the author of this article talks about how this problem is already solved - just not for him.

OSS itself is not a business model. OSS is provably sustainable. Dude just wants it handed to him.

[–] cerevant@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago (3 children)

There are plenty of people who get paid to write open source software. The internet simply wouldn’t exist without OSS:

  • Linux/Android
  • Apache/Nginx
  • MySQL/Postgres
  • gcc/llvm

And that’s just scratching the surface.

view more: next ›