chaogomu

joined 10 months ago
[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 1 points 47 minutes ago

These folks have a good breakdown of RCV's flaws. https://www.equal.vote/rcv_v_star

A lot of it boils down to how RCV is just a series of First Past the Post elections on the same ballot. This means that it can never really rise above FPtP.

Fun fact that the site I provided gets wrong, RCV isn't actually 150 years old, it's actually a bit older. The Marquis de Condorcet actually came up with the idea in the 1790s, but abandoned it because of its flaws.

If you want some unrelated reading, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marquis_de_Condorcet The guy was based as fuck.

Here's a direct quote from one of his more influential works, "On the Admission of Women to the Rights of Citizenship"

The rights of men stem exclusively from the fact that they are sentient beings, capable of acquiring moral ideas and of reasoning upon them. Since women have the same qualities, they necessarily also have the same rights. Either no member of the human race has any true rights, or else they all have the same ones; and anyone who votes against the rights of another, whatever his religion, colour or sex, automatically forfeits his own.

That was 1790.

Sadly, the political party that was backing him fell out of power and the replacements had him arrested, and possibly killed.

This was his final work http://files.libertyfund.org/files/1669/Condorcet_0878_EBk_v6.0.pdf

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 9 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

That is the fastest way to turn a blue state red.

Split the vote so that the minority Republican vote can win. Because there are more registered Republicans in California than in Texas.

No, the actual answer is to change the voting system to a Cardinal system, so that there are no such things as Spoiler party's or split votes.

Approval or STAR are the answer. Either would enable third parties to exist and thrive.

As a note RCV is not a Cardinal system, and still has the Spoiler Effect. People lie about it saying it's the fix for all problems, but it's actually worse than what we have (there are parts that are better, but more parts that are far worse)

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is blue sky federated? I thought it was another closed garden. If slightly more open than Twitter.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I support that guy's Hitler killing policy. Just wish he implemented it in 1920 rather than in 1945.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you think Hitler was loyal to Eva Braun, we've been reading vastly different books.

No, Hitler was just as much a sex pest as any other dictator, and was pretty bad before gaining power. Like targeting 14 year olds, and his 14 year old niece.

But he also had uncontrollable flatulence that could clear a ballroom. Which goes to show that while time travelers couldn't kill him, they certainly could fuck with him.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

The true captains of industry do want this. chaos is how they transfer wealth from the poor to themselves.

In a depression, the money doesn't vanish, it goes into the pockets of the super rich.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

That's actually the plan.

Bankrupt the government and sell it off for parts.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

That attitude isn't helpful either.

Bipartisanship is possible, but only by convincing everyone to come further left.

Because actual left leaning policy is popular.

That's the true lesson that Democrats refuse to learn. Mostly because they've been paid not to.

We need a cardinal voting system.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Technically it's the other way around. The size of the electoral college is determined by the size of the House plus the Senate.

Now, the House was meant to increase in size as the population increased.

Now, since the mechanism for that increase wasn't spelled out in the constitution, there were heated arguments every 10 years over the new maps, but it came to a head in 1921.

Long story short, the permanent apportionment act of 1929 set the size of the House at 435 members. We've added two states since then, and the US population has tripped. But still it's 435.

Repealing that one law would fix several problems.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Fun fact, there's a 2008 law that specifically forces the president to give Israel all the best military hardware.

It was passed by W on his way out the door, and due to the Democratic party being compromised as hell, there's never been enough votes to get rid of it, and any time the president might want to hold things back, they get sued under that law.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's used for very minor repairs, in this case, a more permanent repair is under the tape, but is likely curing, so they slap some speed tape on it.

Speed tape never holds anything down, it's just used to smooth over a surface, to allow better air flow.

Whatever is being covered by the speed tape will likely see more attention from maintenance later.

https://www.salon.com/2011/10/27/ryanair_duct_tape_controversy/

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

No, it won't change the minds of his base.

But there are people he wouldn't consider his base, that also tend to vote conservative, who were actually offended by some of those jokes. And then realized that hey, Trump and company are white nationalists, and that means that no minority will be safe.

It's a tiny minority of Trump supporters, but as close as this election could be, that's more than enough.

Now, Trump is planning on stealing the election anyway. Via disrupting or delaying certification of votes past December 11th, Which then means that there will be incomplete slates of electors, which means the election goes to the House, and each State gets one vote instead of the house itself voting.

They're going to try to use Section three of the 20th amendment.

If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President-elect shall have died, the Vice President-elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President-elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President-elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President-elect nor a Vice President-elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.

Fun times to live in...

view more: next ›