cheese_greater

joined 1 year ago
[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

How can I go from rando to content producer?

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Can you take it easy, partner. I believe exactly what you do

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Sure, its traversable if you don't type anything in the search

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

I suspect these types require the ROI sort of justification for not doing what they are orherwise inclined towards

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago (6 children)

People need to understand: your personal life will mix with professional and something like this gon' get out if you do it. Just chill the fuck out and create buffers if you can't get along well under one roof

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Let me be ur Xitter

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

And verse viceuh

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

Please do top level tho

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

Yes. People can clarify or dialogue in their replies to whatever

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

Lemmy I mean. I did, check my feed

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

I feel like 😅 was the "stop perceiving me" emojii

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

😃

Happy, same as in post body. Maybe smarter

 

I like pure red light (#FF0000) because its relaxing and lessens visual information overload

Baker-Miller pink is also interesting, was proposed to reduce violence and promote calmness in prison. Also very relaxing

 

I find myself often winging it with "themself/themselves" and it seems to be like themselves is always colloquially correct when there are multiple preceding nouns you're referring to...

Otherwise if there's only one antecedent or whatever, its themself

Be gentle haha

-10
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by cheese_greater@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world
 

I want to understand it but everything I read about it oscillates impossibly between vulgar metals -> gold and some kind of spiritual transformation metaphysical stuff

What is it and what can be legit gleaned from it in an empirical or useful sense?

Does it have utility outside of use as a metaphor or allegory or whatever?

 

I'm more referring to when a random person experiences a random craving for something they've had before.

Does that generally point to something you've had before that unknowingly satisfied a deficiency and which your body tacitly took note of?

I notice it sometimes, like

Beef = i "need" a burger (I'm a skinny dude, beef is not a common staple for me)

Fruit: i need juice or actual berries in yogurt for a smoothie or parfait

 

I loved a cafe with super comfy couches and chill ambiance (few years). Would love to have a similar haunt someday again but I don't believe I will find it

 

24 Hour daily agenda (30 minute blocks)

This was from David Burns Feeling Good and I found it quite useful at various points. Basically:

1 Use a form or make your own spreadsheet with all 24 hours of the day covered but split up even further into 30 or 15 minute blocks. It also has a section to report what you scheduled vs what you ended up doing

2 Brainstorm all the things you need or would like to get done and give a time estimate for each based on how long its taken you ideally in the past

3 Schedule each item based on how much effort/complexity it requires (earlier = more complex/energy-intensive) and make sure the tasks are spaced so that there is enough time and a little buffer for breathing room (based on your durations)

Sorta looks like this, can't seem to find the original necessarily but you get the point

Very useful and practical tool

Please name the tool/exercise and limit to CBT for this thread (I want to cover and discover others in future topics focused on them). I really want to avoid boilerplate namedropping "this or that therapy but you'd have to pay to see a therapist, you wouldn't understand". That just not helpful, please elaborate Any pedantic replies not answering question won't be entertained

 

By stochastic, I mean it randomly ticks on only one arbitrary beat per measure

 

I sort of want to see what these things are like but I don't want to give them any data or contribute to them in any way haha. I've heard the Queen of Canada uses it which intrigues me

 

By drinkable, I mean if theres pasta or vegatables they are small and the soup is generally able to be drank rather than necessarily needing a utensil to take in

All I can think of are

  • italian wedding soup
  • Liptons cup o soup (wish there was a heartier version of this with similar noodles but infinity of them)

EDIT: Pretty sure I wanna do something like The Geeky Chef's "Elixir Soup" from Windwaker but I want to find little noodles like Lipton's Cup o' Soup

view more: ‹ prev next ›