cmgvd3lw

joined 11 months ago
[–] cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Yes, you can easily do that. Set the container name and make them on the same network. Used caddy and whole bunch of Selfhostable services with it and I reverse proxy as

container_name:port
[–] cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No its on 4.x I think.

[–] cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Podman actually run fine on Debian 12. Though the packaged version is a bit old. Does not support podman compose command. Though podman-compose works.

[–] cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

One of the main reason I switched to podman was its compatibility with firewalld. Haven't used rootless docker, but podman and podman-compose gets the job done for me.

[–] cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 days ago

This this right here.

[–] cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Magic of fediverse

[–] cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 4 days ago (7 children)

Why can't no one make good original movies anymore?

[–] cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

People at postmarketOS is working on Linux for smartphones. They are using Gnome. There is your answer.

[–] cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago

I am not self hosting an LLM, but running on my laptop with Alpaca. Google's Gemma 2B. On my hardware its pretty slow, but kind of gets the work done. My hardware is getting old, need to upgrade soon.

[–] cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes. Having used both, ultrasonic have better accuracy and much faster unlocking speed. Works better with wet fingers in my experience. Also when you unlock your phone at night, you won't be blinded by bright white light.

But it is not an absolutely essential feature. The other will get the work done in budget to midrange phones.

 

Was browsing on the GrapheneOS website and came across a new thing called WebUSB, which is essentially a JS API through which GrapheneOS web installer worked.

This got me wondering, if website could read what's plugged into my computer like my phone or disks, isn't that a huge risk to privacy? I don't know how this works (haven't used it) so I would like to know about its privacy.

AFAIK Firefox doesn't allow this API, so that's a relief (I use librefox), but what about other browsers? I am getting a bit paranoid.

[Also, are there other APIs like these; which are a privacy nightmare that websites could use?]

26
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
 

I began using invidious after every piped instances refused to play videos lately. But what I read from their docs is that my IP might get exposed to google servers while loading videos from invidious. I use rethink DNS app and in that I can see all the domains that are getting called by my browser.

I tested about five instances and none are calling googlevideo domain as mentioned in the doc. Are they proxying my requests by default or am I missing something?

No, I don't have the option proxy video turned on. I use yewtu.be as my main invidious instance.

 

Couple of months prior, I read an article on Mozilla, where they did a research on automakers and found none comply to good privacy measures. I am planning to buy a used car. I want to know how the data is collected and transmitted.

The car comes with a connected app though I am not planning to use it. It also has apple car play and android auto. Should I use those? The article states some manufacturers even records sexual activities. How are they transmitting these informations? Through connected phones?

My use is fairly basic, I want to use the Bluetooth audio system in the car for listening to music on my phone. I use maps on my phone.

What about car servicing? Can they access stored information?

 

With the recent WWDC apple made some bold claims about privacy when it comes to so called Apple Intelligence. This makes me wonder if they did something to what Microsoft did with Recall feature, would people be less concerned and to an extend praise their effort?

Do you trust apple with their claims?

 

(timestamp-link) iPad Pro M4 Hands on - Why I just bought it.
Review from a top YT reviewer, Mrwhosetheboss. How do you guys feel about it?

 

Applications like EndeavorOS Welcome, Tor browser won't show their actual icons on the taskbar after Gnome 46 update. I have observed that applications launched by invoking the binary through terminal using ./ behaves this way. (Not sure about the EOS Welcome) Is there any fix to this?

OS: EndeavourOS Linux x86_64. DE: GNOME 46.1. Icons: Papirus [GTK2/3].

[Edit: This is not a freshly installed system. Icons were working fine till Gnome 45.]

 

Basically the question. I use work profile (created with shelter). The stock android launcher supports this personal/work separation. But I want to know whether nothing phone launcher support this feature. I know you can install a third party launcher like lawnchair for this. But with these 3rd party launchers the gesture support is really bad.

 

Does cloud providers share the IP addresses and the alloted users to these big corps and defect the whole purpose of a privacy frontend? Are there any service (FOSS) that could randomise my servers IP?

Might be a noob question but I want to start self hosting.

 

Preferably a docker image, but given the instructions, I could build an image.
Any suggestions on the best practises are also welcome. Like the type of server (VM/Swarm/K8s) etc.

 

There might be some simple explanation but i cannot figure it out.

 

In the current spectrum, how much should one spend to get the best value? I know everyone has a different taste and budget. But analysing the current trend of smartphone culture could give a bit of insight into spending wisely.

view more: next ›