culprit

Picked up this phrase from a random comment a few years ago:

philosophically I'm an anarchist, so pragmatically I'm a communist and currently I'm a socialist

Think of the grifting opportunities! I hope someone does something funny.

Oh please don't throw me in the briar patch!

this is ostrich riding erasure

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stateless_society

In stateless societies, there is little concentration of authority. Most positions of authority that do exist are very limited in power, and they are generally not permanent positions, and social bodies that resolve disputes through predefined rules tend to be small.

Over the course of history most stateless peoples have become integrated into external state-based societies.

Some political philosophies, particularly anarchism, regard the state as an unwelcome institution and stateless societies as the ideal, while Marxism considers that in a post-capitalist society, the state would become unnecessary and would wither away.

This is the goal. As the means of production are socialized (owned by everyone), the concentrations of wealth, influence, power and authority would be eroded down. It is continually iterative process with democratic and participatory inputs.

https://lemmy.ml/post/3795675

also from the wiki link:

Von Mildenstein's articles explored several questions about the future of Palestine and the viability of Zionism in what he described as the "turbulent Orient".

Contrary to the derogatory stereotypes prevalent in Nazi propaganda, von Mildenstein depicted the Jewish settlers in Palestine as optimistic and industrious, a direct contradiction to the Nazi portrayal of Jews.

from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zionist_antisemitism:

Jewish scholar Ze'ev Jabotinsky, who developed Revisionist Zionism in the 20th century, wrote:

Our starting point is to take the typical Yid of today and to imagine his diametrical opposite ... because the Yid is ugly, sickly, and lacks decorum, we shall endow the ideal image of the Hebrew with masculine beauty. The Yid is trodden upon and easily frightened and, therefore, the Hebrew ought to be proud and independent. The Yid is despised by all and, therefore, the Hebrew ought to charm all. The Yid has accepted submission and, therefore, the Hebrew ought to learn how to command. The Yid wants to conceal his identity from strangers and, therefore, the Hebrew should look the world straight in the eye and declare: "I am a Hebrew!"

Added archive link

~~TikTok~~ ~~China~~

TeleMessage Israel or anyone really

You would have turned in Anne Frank.

I stand with Ghorman and condemn the Empire's action towards them without supporting the rebel terrorists. Pro-rebel supporters don't understand that the rebels don't have good intentions.