culprit

Uyghurs saying

Checking the sources on a wikipedia page is actually gish gallop. LMAO

Actually checking sources is Gish gallop. LMAO

[citations needed]

Not one gram of logical understanding.

You are the only one mentioning Russia on a thread about Democratic incumbents losing due to zionism. Your rhetorical ability is like agent orange to any rational thought.

Not one gram of logical understanding. All those sources are clearly ideological, but you seem to prefer that over any actual proof.

Your rhetorical ability is a hate crime.

There's a distinct lack of Data for these claims. Unless that all just Lore?

always check the sources

[1] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YbhU1v_48OxAHokzpWA_aZi8I3hIVcJK/view

This is a report by Rushan Abbas. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rushan_Abbas

Abbas founded Campaign for Uyghurs. The non-profit is based in Washington, DC

[2] https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/04/12/surviving-the-crackdown-in-xinjiang

Adrian Zenz, an independent academic who has unearthed troves of government documents on Chen’s crackdown, estimated that there were as many as a million people in the camps—a statistic echoed by the United Nations and others. Not since the Holocaust had a country’s minority population been so systematically detained.

Adrian Zenz, the academic, uncovered government records from 2018

[3] https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14623528.2020.1848109

20 Adrian Zenz, “Sterilizations, IUDs and Mandatory Birth Control: The CCP’s Campaign to Suppress Uyghur Birthrates

[4] Paywalled

[5] https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1834&context=gsp

Adrian Zenz’s research on Chinese documents and statistical data on birth rates in 2019

and 9 other mentions of Zenz

[6] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/extra/nz0g306v8c/china-tainted-cotton

and 3 other mentions of Zenz

[7] https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/IF10281.pdf

page not found

[8] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-xinjiang-rights/muslim-minority-in-chinas-xinjiang-face-political-indoctrination-human-rights-watch-idUSKCN1LQ01F/

No direct link to any sources, but seems to be talking about this one from HRW:

https://www.hrw.org/news/2017/09/10/china-free-xinjiang-political-education-detainees

That report cites RadioFreeAsia (US funded propaganda) and Adrian Zenz reporting.

https://jamestown.org/xinjiangs-rapidly-evolving-security-state/

[9] https://apnews.com/article/269b3de1af34e17c1941a514f78d764C

according to new research obtained by The Associated Press in advance of publication by China scholar Adrian Zenz.

and 6 other mentions of Zenz

[10] https://www.voanews.com/a/east-asia-pacific_china-forces-birth-control-uighurs-suppress-population/6191919.html

Literally US propaganda outlet Voice of America.

according to new research obtained by The Associated Press in advance of publication by China scholar Adrian Zenz.

I think that's enough for now to get my point across.

Claims of a genocide requires proof. That's duly lacking in this case (unless you want to believe blatant propaganda which it seems you are full-throated in endorsing). I'll wait for any clear evidence that is not directly related to ideological propaganda.

Does this qualify as gender-affirming healthcare?

“During the cold war, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard. By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative. If the churches in the USSR were empty, this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full, this meant the people were rejecting the regime's atheistic ideology. If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions), this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system; if they didn't go on strike, this was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom. A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated the failure of the economic system; an improvement in consumer supplies meant only that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them. If communists in the United States played an important role struggling for the rights of workers, the poor, African-Americans, women, and others, this was only their guileful way of gathering support among disfranchised groups and gaining power for themselves. How one gained power by fighting for the rights of powerless groups was never explained. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum.”

― Michael Parenti, Blackshirts and Reds: Rational Fascism and the Overthrow of Communism