curiousaur

So you're saying she should not be having bisexual threesomes? I think that's fucked up, let her have whatever adult sex she wants.

No it's not valid. That's litterally the tu quoque fallacy a form of ad hominem.

People are attacking her for having bisexual threesoms. That's a shitty thing to do. Let her have all the sex she wants with whoever she wants, it's none of our business.

That's a fallacy. If I say it's bad to kill people, then I kill someone, was I wrong when I said it's bad?

What someone does is separate from the validity of what they say.

You just defined ad hominem in the same sentence you said it's not.

If they are making bad policy, then focus on that because it's bad. Not because the individual doesn't actually follow it.

I'm not saying it's a debate, just be the change you want to be. If we sex shame them, we're saying they're right to be doing the same.

Try being the change you want to see. Celebrate their relationship.

Your first sentence, you state it's not an appeal to hypocrisy, then you define hypocrisy in the same sentence.

The issue is not discriminating against the rights of others while giving yourself those same rights. The issue is discriminating. Period. There's no other caveots there.

If you're going to sex shame them, you're just as bad as them. Let's celebrate their sexuality instead.

Then your last sentence, "it is better to use a fallacy to force them to think logically". C'mon what the fuck are you even saying? It's self defeating since you're already not thinking logically if you're using fallacies. You're talking about FORCING SOMEONE TO THINK? You are just as bad as them.

So what? We don't judge people for their sexuality. Challenges of hypocrisy are ad hominem.

Their views and politics are trash no matter what they like to do in the bedroom. If we can't be better...