curiousaur

joined 1 year ago
[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They thought Hillary couldn't lose too.

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago

Don't put work into anything you don't own.

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 9 points 10 months ago

While trying their hardest to keep everyone, even white males, poor and uneducated.

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

In the face.

It's hard to squib the face, which is where he shot her.

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

When it becomes one click to see the chick across from you naked, tell me how many 16 year old boys won't. You are far too naive to be having this conversation.

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

It's not illegal to to work on, sell, or distribute the models. And making that illegal is what the first commenter said would be dangerous to do, since then regular people wouldn't be able to compete with corporation's abilities.

Once the models and portable hardware are good enough, and it's just a matter of time, I think you're underestimating how ubiquitous it will become.

Every teenage boy will have a pair of nudie glasses in the form of their smartphone running open source models, and you think they're just going to not use them?

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 0 points 10 months ago (5 children)

It's probably a bit of an exaggeration, but my point stands. It's going to be so easy for anyone to see ai gen material of anyone else, no one is going to care anymore.

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago (7 children)

I don't think you're properly understanding the paradigm shift that's coming with these models being open source and widely available while wearable AR smart glasses get better.

"You know Sharon is HR, look at this scandalous photo of her."

"Uh, I'm seeing a live generated porno of everyone in this room right now, why would I care about that."

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago (9 children)

Like what? Why share something when anyone curious to see it can instantly generate their own?

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago (11 children)

You conceded that no one cares if someone makes images locally then deletes them. But that's how they're all going to be made shortly.

Currently folks are sharing them because not everyone has the means to create them, some folks do, and share what they've made.

Once litterally every can just make them the moment they want to, no one will be sharing. Everyone will fall under that use case that you admitted no one would care about, which is exactly what I've been saying. It's 1. futile to try to stop, and 2. going to become so wide spread that we as a society will stop caring about it.

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 15 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Because it burns you. That's the answer. It kills your skin cells and eyes the same way it kills the bacteria. Also, it is everywhere, it's fucking outside. The sun. Fucking stupid. Idiots.

Know what else kills bacteria? Bleach. So get chugging.

So stupid.

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago (13 children)

If everyone could create their own, and just run it locally, explain how the laws could be enforced?

view more: ‹ prev next ›