data1701d

joined 2 years ago
[–] data1701d@startrek.website 1 points 4 hours ago

DS9 is about the only 80s/90s Trek series with an almost completely watchable 1st season, though.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

As stupid as it is, at least this attempt at reviving Winamp doesn't seem to have any rhetoric about how it's going to be "built for the glorius inevitable agentic AI future revolution from the ground up" and talk about how "curating music has never been easier" because their "most advanced music AI in human history" takes away the need to have any personality, taste, or ears of your own.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 4 points 5 hours ago

I mean, the Blu-Rays are still easy enough to find and rip, although you have to spend $40 on season 1 because they never released reason 1 as one set. But honestly, giving Paramount cash in any form isn't that compelling.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 1 points 5 hours ago

I basically just gave three (or at least 2, as the DISCO one maybe is a bit iffy) examples of modern Star Trek scrutinizing the means despite the obstensibly good ends.

Also, another example is S2 E2 "Ad Astra Per Aspera" borderline almost literally puts "the moral cost of the means" (keeping good genetically modified people like Una out of Starfleet) that is ostensibly done for the ends of preventing another Eugenics Wars. I wouldn't hesitate to call this episode one of the best in the whole franchise, very much in the tradition of court case ethical discussion episodes like "Measure of a Man".

I don't think one can make a blanket statement about newer Star Trek quitting "believing something"; sure, it may be uneven in quality (maybe more than classic)*, but dismissing all of "NuTrek" out of hand is akin to throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

: I mean, there's whatever DIS season 2 was, Section 31, most of PIC, etc., but also, it's not like good swathes of classic Trek aren't also kind of crap - I mean, there's the time Riker murdered his clone and nobody batted an eye, as well as TOS S3, TNG S1, and the inconsistency of VOY. Even in the good classic episodes, it's not like every one is "do the ends justify the means" - in addition to other ethical themes, classic Trek still had room for simply "Cool sci-fi s** happened and we have to deal with it", not to mention episodes focused on interpersonal drama like "Data's Day" or any of Deanna's "Oh f*** my mother is on board" episodes.

Hey, sneaking Alexander onto the holodeck is more than Worf ever did as a father.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I would say it depends.

I mean, the ends not justifying the means is kind of the entire point of DISCO S1 (whether or not the rest of DISCO embodied it is a different matter); Burnham has to let go of what Lorca summarizes as "Universal law is for lackeys. Context is for kings." or in other words, the ends often justify the means.

Also, SNW is better about it, than say, PIC; for instance, SNW S3 E7 "What is Starfleet?" from 2025, for all its flaws (including in some ways being very similar to TNG "Tin Man"), basically has the crew going "WTF! The ends (saving an alien race from a war they didn't start) do not justify the means (enslaving a sentient space whale)!" Also, SNW 1x06 is basically "ends don't justify means", although mostly because it basically copied "The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas".

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 3 points 5 days ago

I'll have to see if this is in the officially published edition, but I'm currently at my dorm and both my Tech Manuals are at home.

One I bought in a used book shop in Sedona, and the other I got with a big load of Trek books that someone gave away back in 2025.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 2 points 5 days ago

Uploading a gz source archive to a Git repository is absolutely cursed. Still, looks like a cool project.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 3 points 5 days ago

I'll also add that if you do enable SSH and are stupid enough to expose port 22, then at least make sure you have key-based authentication instead of password authentication and keep your keys safe.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 4 points 6 days ago

I could never get Gnome Network Displays to work, but it's worth a shot.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 3 points 1 week ago

I saw my baby crying hard as babe could cry. What could I do? My baby's love had gone, and left my baby blue. Nobody knew

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 3 points 1 week ago

Personally, I think the most scarring sci-fi moment I ever had was the Doctor Who episode with the TVs that eat people's faces.

 

Hey. I just wanted to say I've been and will continue to be taking a break from this instance and Lemmy for a while.

While I've had some fun in my almost two years here, lately, I've had a bit of an addictive, unhealthy relationship with it and want to reclaim my time, and I was really getting too emotional over things that don't matter, to the point it negatively affected my wellbeing. Thus, I've changed my password to a random one and saved it in a GPG-encrypted file for when I'm ready to come back.

Thanks to all the people that have made my time on here a good one, especially server admins and many of the frequent posters. I could be back in a few weeks, in a few months, or as Benjamin Sisko said, yesterday.

13
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by data1701d@startrek.website to c/tenforward@lemmy.world
 

cross-posted from: https://startrek.website/post/34202658

Listen to TMBG Eyeball EP when it comes out 1/15/2026 or I'll treat you like the dishonorable petaQ you are and shove my mek'leth down your throat!

7
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by data1701d@startrek.website to c/risa@startrek.website
 

Listen to TMBG Eyeball EP when it comes out 1/15/2026 or I'll treat you like the dishonorable petaQ you are and shove my mek'leth down your throat!

 

Paramount+ doesn't have the "Spanish (Latin American" dub beyond season 2, and I've long been wondering if it even exists for later seasons. It would be a travesty if it didn't, as most voices were at least tolerable, and Boimler straight up sounded like Jack Quaid speaking Spanish.

I've heard that there are two Spanish dubs out there for it: the Latin American one on P+ that's pretty good, and a horrible Castillian dialect one. It would be a shame if the Blu-Ray used the latter, or even worse, the product claims to have a Spanish dub but only has it for two seasons.

Anyone who's already bought it, I would be immensely thankful if you could check that:

  • Spanish dub even exists beyond season 2.
  • Maybe post something like an audio clip with a scene including Boimler from each season so I can see if it's the same dub.

Thank you for your time. Have a good one.

 

cross-posted from: https://startrek.website/post/33778507

I made this about 3.5 years ago and forgot about it, never uploading it anywhere. Sorry for your pain.

 

I made this about 3.5 years ago and forgot about it, never uploading it anywhere. Sorry for your pain.

1
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by data1701d@startrek.website to c/quarks@startrek.website
 

Excerpts from Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Fit 11 that pretty much summarize how the AI industry really works, so long as you swap a few words.

All aboard the AI Event Horizon train. 😭

EDIT: Sorry, I set my Gitlab permissions wrong. Should be able to view now.

 

cross-posted from: https://startrek.website/post/32667508

Alternatively, the whales' musical sequence from the 2005 film.

 

Alternatively, the whales' musical sequence from the 2005 film.

175
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by data1701d@startrek.website to c/tenforward@lemmy.world
 

cross-posted from: https://startrek.website/post/30091443

Note: I'm not casting all Republicans as a "skin of evil" here; I feel many of them are just people trying to make their way in the world whose daily struggles and fears have been amplified manipulated by the "skin of evil", an administration that constantly denies human rights and demonizes (as well as convinces its followers to partake in the demonization of) people who, for the most part, are also just trying to make their way in the world. I've known Republicans, and while the people they give their support to frighten me, most of the ones I've know aren't demons.

EDIT: To be clear, I’m not saying Republican voters did nothing wrong, that they don’t deserve consequences, or that we should avoid making them feel bad. In many ways, the “skin of evil” is their collective wrongs and the way they enabled the current horrors. The evil, however, is a subset of a person (sometimes almost the whole set, though), while the “skin of evil” is the set of evil. Also, I admit I feel a bit on the availability heuristic and that “most of the ones I know” isn’t the strongest evidence.

52
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by data1701d@startrek.website to c/risa@startrek.website
 

Note: I'm not casting all Republicans as a "skin of evil" here; I feel many of them are just people trying to make their way in the world whose daily struggles and fears have been amplified manipulated by the "skin of evil", an administration that constantly denies human rights and demonizes (as well as convinces its followers to partake in the demonization of) people who, for the most part, are also just trying to make their way in the world. I've known Republicans, and while the people they give their support to frighten me, most of the ones I've know aren't demons.

EDIT: To be clear, I’m not saying Republican voters did nothing wrong, that they don’t deserve consequences, or that we should avoid making them feel bad. In many ways, the “skin of evil” is their collective wrongs and the way they enabled the current horrors. The evil, however, is a subset of a person (sometimes almost the whole set, though), while the “skin of evil” is the set of evil. Also, I admit I feel a bit on the availability heuristic and that “most of the ones I know” isn’t the strongest evidence.

 

In the minute possibly that a TOS continuation were to happen, where should they start from?

Would they go from end of TAS in 2270, or would they start from end of TOS in 2269, overlapping in time with TAS?

In the latter case, I would hope they do it so it’s in-between star dates of TAS to avoid bungling the chronology.

This also opens up the possibility for retelling some TAS episodes; I think most TAS episodes best belong in TAS, with the TAS camp and overall continued TOS storytelling conventions being fundamental to their charm. Live action remakes of a lot of these episodes would probably serve just to strip them of their soul rather than add anything.

The main exception I can think of might be “Yesteryear”; I think having an “extended version” as a full 50 minute episode or even possibly a 2-parter could allow them to add more depth to the story in a way that doesn’t severely break canon, showing more of Spock’s family life and school life as well as Vulcan society in general. I think this is a big story well-suited to newer Trek’s more dramatic storytelling style.

I think the biggest difficulty might be how they would handle young Michael Burnham in this episode. I think the easiest thing to do would be to just say Burnham’s parents were killed in December 2236 and “Yesteryear” happened in January 2237 a couple weeks to a month before Sarek took in Burnham. While I don’t necessarily hate the idea of young Burnham, I think Spock dealing with suddenly having a new adoptive sister would unnecessarily convolute the plot, so my solution works around that. I don’t want Yesteryear to be turned from a coming-of-age and being different story to one about sibling bonding. Then again, maybe they can pull it off and make something good.

What are your thoughts on this? Any other TAS episodes you think could benefit from being adapted into a live action episode?

view more: next ›