davetapley

joined 1 year ago
[–] davetapley@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Forgive me for only TLDW and not watching, but was ack mentioned?

I've never looked back.

[–] davetapley@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well that's it, it almost always is more convenient (again, assuming you have one, it has fuel, roads are built and prioritize cars etc.), but that completely ignores all the negative externalities.

Like: it would always be more 'convenient' for me to pee against a wall when I need to go, but if everyone starting pissing everywhere it would be objectively worse for everyone.

[–] davetapley@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

I love this! Really gets at the essence of what I was thinking, thank you.

 

I'm getting a lot of 'but my car is more convenient' arguments lately, and I'm struggling to convey why that doesn't make sense.

Specifically how to explain to people that: Sure, if you are able to drive, and can afford it, and your city is designed to, and subsidizes making it easy to drive and park, then it's convenient. But if everyone does it then it quickly becomes a tragedy of the commons situation.

I thought of one analogy that is: It would be 'more convenient' if I just threw my trash out the window, but if we all started doing that then we'd quickly end up in a mess.

But I feel like that doesn't quite get at the essence of it. Any other ideas?

 

Just came across this article about a book titled:

The Anxious Generation: How the Great Rewiring of Childhood Is Causing An Epidemic of Mental Illness

I haven't read it, but I'm a little concerned that the article has zero mention of the built environment. Thoughts?

 

My current pet peeve is people complaining about the 'cost' of protected bike lanes because "people on bikes don't pay their way".

Beyond even the data showing just how much private car ownership is already subsidized, can we just take a moment and acknowledge: We wouldn't need protected lanes at all if cars were not killing and injuring so many people.

It's like the owner of an animal bemoaning the cost of an enclosure for their animal, which keeps killing and maiming members of the public as they pass by.

It's not the victim's fault the enclosure is needed, and it's not the fault of someone riding a bike they need protection in a public space.

[–] davetapley@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

This. I'm a computer programmer, never been in a union, but after twenty years of startups I cannot believe how good it is to be at a small, stable, employee owned company.

Only looking back do I realize that the people doing the actual work were never in control, and just how damaging that is.

To pour you life and soul into building something (time, and time again), and then have it taken away from you again, and again.

Never going back.

[–] davetapley@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

People should be allowed to have a car, but it should be parked at the edge of the neighborhood and only be allowed to come in for loading and unloading of heavy things

That's exactly what this development is?

[–] davetapley@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well, not necessarily, right? It could be funded any number of ways, but on YT you're locked in to either watching their ads, or paying their premium.

[–] davetapley@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well yes, this is the problem isn't it:

  1. Monopoly X sucks
  2. Federated alternatives developed
  3. People complain that there's not enough content on them
[–] davetapley@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I've been really enjoying https://nebula.tv/, but yes, I wish they'd built it on top of PeerTube.

[–] davetapley@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (13 children)

A lemmy for video streaming

Ask and you shall receive: https://joinpeertube.org/

There are even companies springing up who will run and host it for you, for a price, of course.

[–] davetapley@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dare I ask where he is hiding this, and what bonkers evil regimes you are referring to?

[–] davetapley@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Why "never support"?

[–] davetapley@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Amazing summary, and I'm glad you mentioned landlords. I am having such a struggle lately when people tell me about their 'side hustle' as a landlord, and how they make so much passive income. I just wanna scream "so you feel good about making money doing basically nothing while there are so many people unsheltered, and living paycheck to paycheck?".

68
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by davetapley@lemmy.world to c/workreform@lemmy.world
 

A video explaining modern monetary theory and how with a little Marxism it can benefit everyone.

 

Just need to vent. A short recap:

  1. I​n September 2022, Phoenix City Council unanimously approves a comprehensive Vision Zero Road Safety Action Plan. Yey.

  2. "Pavement maintenance (new asphalt) is scheduled along this corridor, which presents an opportunity to reconfigure the striping"

Perfect! In line with Vision Zero can re-stripe to optimize for safety of all road users!

What's that? First you want to check if that'll upset people who are used to having free parking for their personal vehicles there?

... and if it does upset people then actually fuck the safety of other people parking is most important thing...

And, surprise surprise, people who are used to having free parking for their personal vehicles are indeed upset that the free parking they were never entitled to in the first place will be taken away.

Well then! Fuck those people on bikes indeed! Get a car asshole and drive like a normal person; hey at least there's lots of free parking in Phoenix!

 

Before I open on GitHub, to be sure, there's no way to filter posts by date range, right?

view more: next ›