You also used a comic as "evidence" literally one message up. you have no legs.
easily3667
Bud we were talking about not eating fish. The question was why you think not eating fish would be ineffective at solving this problem.
Or..are you literally just saying that 1 person not eating fish won't stop fishing? Cause if so, I really should just block you.
It's not exactly a scam, though, is it. Are the game companies committing fraud?
I suppose if it's a full mile that's possible for some schools.
My earliest knowledge was 2011, can confirm
No, this was obvious a decade or more ago and it's still obvious today. I believe it followed the rule that "if there is something only male libertarians like, it's not good".
The story of Bitcoin is the same story as PayPal and Peter thiel and the first X, except the man-children are less famous.
You're being extremely hostile for no real reason. I'm allowed to be amused that two concepts that are similar to me are distinct in your head. You have zero reason to be offended right now, but you've decided to take up arms and be an ass.
I'd suggest you wait a day until your panties are no longer in a bunch and reread the actual words and see if you still feel butthurt. Then I'd suggest you spend some time thinking through why something completely innocuous and generally positive made you so upset. It will probably make you a better person and is cheaper than therapy.
Your explanation doesn't make me less amused but is interesting
Lol "supposed to"
Tell me another joke
Weird take. Web browsers are document display systems that got a bunch built on top of them. Old websites are just documents. Web browsers are meant to render them. New websites are a single html entry point that hands all website construction to JavaScript which then creates a fake document in memory for the web browser to render.
Which one is the convoluted, hard to implement and support one?
Example: NYTimes website is literally a giant document. It could be pure html and lose nothing by being rendered on the server side....except capitalism. So it can't be a document because the NYTimes needs to extract a reliable and consistent money stream from people, which means it needs to be enforced (according to them) and thus JavaScript.
I honestly don't know what point you meant to make but with the tone, all I personally took from this was "get off my lawn, you damn foreign brats"
Are you...ok? Do you really not understand that this was a polite wink at the other person's username?
Being a programmer isn't an excuse for having zero concept of normal conversation.