fishos

joined 2 years ago
[–] fishos@lemmy.world -1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Attention whore on an imaginary crusade. That's all you are. Should change your name to Don Quiote.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Bullshit. In another comment you literally complain about them posting comments(3 communist comments I think you said?) and not fixing this because in your words it should take less time to just fix it. You also say that their response(or lack of) to this specific post is interesting to you as proof of their inner motivations.

Furthermore, if you didn't want them to fix it, then tagging them is only to bully them.

You're so full of shit you can't even keep it straight since you posted this an hour ago.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Oh I abso-fucking-lutely can imagine seeing someone spamming me with DMs or making a public post to try and shame me instead of commenting on the actual source project going straight into my "ignore this twat" pile. This post is just a cry for attention. You're trying to be some sort of hero, saving us from evil or some shit.

Go make a GitHub request like a reasonable normal person and stop cluttering up others feeds with this inane bs.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

And that's all for analyzing statements. You can't just do that to some words and discover objective truth out of nowhere, so I'm not sure what you think you're accomplishing here. What you're linking is more analogous to the code that underlies an AI(if/while loops and whatnot). Reasoning is closer to the scientific method of forming a hypothesis and whatnot than anything you linked.

You basically just pointed out that there's a math system for logic. Neat.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

I think for a third party to even exist viably, we need ranked choice voting. If Elon wants this party to actually exist, he needs RCV himself. Unless he's just planning to try and consume all of the moderate voters, which is a good bet too based on his ego, unfortunately.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I'm hoping the Dems split into a proper labor party as well

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Yes, and without it, any third party struggles to take hold. This new party could make ranked choice voting a bipartisan(tripartisan?) issue since they would need it to survive unless they really think they can just yank all of the R votes their way.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The fact that you call Bernie "the fringe" and dismiss him, his recent rallys, the Philadelphia sanitation union strike, and so much more shows you just want to be defeatist and spout strawmen. I guess AOC doesn't exist either. So have fun being miserable I guess.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

A new "Republican" party would necessarily have to argue for vote reform in order to make gains. We might be able to spin this into a bipartisan issue. We make it their own self interest to introduce ranked choice voting.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You act as if unions are non-existent and Bernie Sanders has no following.... Unlikely? Sure. But impossible? Nope. Literally half the Dem talk since the election has been about how much Dems feel disenfranchised by their own party. Have you been paying any attention?

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (14 children)

Ok, call me crazy, but hear me out: this is good and we should encourage it.

One fascist party gets all the fascists aligned. Multiple fascist parties split them up. Suddenly their 51% majority is 25% and 26%. We should be fostering the infighting and splitting of the party. We should welcome its own destruction from within.

I'll only believe it when I see it, but this could theoretically be the beginning of the end for a two party system. If done right we could end up with 4 or 5 legitimate parties (including splitting Democrats up and getting a true labor party)

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yes, and I'm here criticizing "actually existing science". That's exactly my point. It's not "real science" when it's injected with politics and emotions like that. It's biased in a way science shouldn't be.

view more: next ›