flumph

joined 1 year ago
[–] flumph@programming.dev 29 points 7 months ago (10 children)

“I don’t think it’s nice to federate with a company that has been cited in multiple independent reports of massacres/genocides,”

And I don't think it's nice to take the choice away from users. I can block threads all on my own -- I don't need a nanny who doesn't even cite their sources.

[–] flumph@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The purpose is to learn how to publish code that cannot be used for forking as open source.

.

I have to obligate the folks to choose whether they want to pay me or help me code.

.

....it was not beneficial to me.

.

...new to gaining good visibility through open source,

[–] flumph@programming.dev 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Your entire comment reads as a refute of OPs criticism and an excuse for Meta's actions. If you were agreeing with OPs criticism, you would typically use phrases like "only five years".

[–] flumph@programming.dev 22 points 7 months ago (3 children)

And? Why take active steps to stop it from working instead of just stopping technical support? Oh yeah, to get more money.

[–] flumph@programming.dev 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yeah. The maintainer said in their blog post they're looking for a license that lets people read the code but not fork it. Isn't that just standard American copyright?

Edit: Looks like they went with CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International). So not an open source license and one that CC themselves recommends not using for software.

[–] flumph@programming.dev 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

This blog from the maintainer makes it clear they have no interest in open source other than to advertise their own skills

Preparing for a New Beginning for Floorp

[–] flumph@programming.dev 25 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm more concerned that the company decided it was OK to meld the "From:" line of her email (asking for support) into her profile. If they think that's an appropriate way to handle PII, I don't trust them.

[–] flumph@programming.dev 50 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I hate patent trolls, but I will say "it couldn't have happened to a nicer company". I hope they both go broke on legal fees.

[–] flumph@programming.dev 0 points 8 months ago

I generally have to disagree on it being disrespectful. There's an inherent cost in any business relationship that has to be accounted for with low volume partners. Every company that offers volume discounting does it for this exact reason -- the price per piece doesn't change, but the other costs can be spread over more pieces.

Could Valve eat some of this cost to promote indie development? Absolutely. But it's not disrespectful to price your product with volume discounts.

[–] flumph@programming.dev 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Misread that as "cat" and thought I was in for a cute satire, not a boring dystopia.

[–] flumph@programming.dev 2 points 8 months ago

Thanks for your comment. I usually travel alone and was like "why would anyone subject themselves to AirBNB." I appreciate the context and perspective.

[–] flumph@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago

Not at all! I had to use ID.me for unemployment and it skeeved me out too.

 

"Should we not be buying VW, BMW, Siemens and Bayer technology and products today because they participated in holocaust and directly collaborated with Hitler?" -- CEO of Kagi when given feedback re: Brave partnership

view more: ‹ prev next ›