frezik

joined 2 days ago
[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Why I change my own oil. Not because I save money--generally don't even before your time is factored in--but because I know how to put on an oil pan bolt without cross threading it.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago

Those figures won't be that far apart. It will somewhat, because higher incomes will have a bigger house and more luxurious car. However, they're putting more of their money into investments, not cost of living.

And I'll reiterate, that's the average for one person, not a family.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

As of 4th quarter 2024, average cost of living for a single person in the US is $4,948/month. Take that $8,333/month, chop off 20% for taxes, and you're already getting uncomfortably close to that number. For a family of four, I really don't see how those numbers work at all.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 hours ago (5 children)

It just needs to be clear and set close to the max fill line. If it's low and/or dark, it wasn't done right.

Alternatively, if you're in a place dedicated to oil changes, you can assume it wasn't done right.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 2 hours ago

Despite the administration’s crackdown and Johnson's suspicions, it’s not known whether the leak came from a member of Congress.

Given the clowns in charge, it's more likely the leak came from inside the White House.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 hours ago

Nah, setting non-standard ports is sound advice in security circles.

People misunderstand the "no security through obscurity" phrase. If you build security as a chain, where the chain is only as good as the weakest link, then it's bad. But if you build security in layers, like a castle, then it can only help. It's OK for a layer to be weak when there are other layers behind it.

Even better, non-standard ports will make 99% of threats go away. They automate scans that are just looking for anything they can break. If they don't see the open ports, they move on. Won't stop a determined attacker, of course, but that's what other layers are for.

As long as there's real security otherwise (TLS, good passwords, etc), it's fine.

If anyone says "that's a false sense of security", ignore them. They've replaced thinking with a cliche.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

All by themselves, weather forecasting satellites justify every dollar put into space programs. The lives saved are incalculable. We are squandering that benefit for no reason whatsoever.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 3 hours ago

One of my favorite exchanges from the 2008 election:

Colbert: tell me about growing up with a silver spoon in your mouth on the south side of Chicago

Michelle Obama: we didn't have silver spoons. We had four spoons.

Colbert: but there were spoons, right?

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 hours ago

The future conservatives want is the same except it's men in fashy uniforms. We don't even have to speculate or joke; it's exactly how mines are run in countries without worker protections.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Conservatives don't make that distinction. Though OP does lean into Poe's Law.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 hours ago

Origami can be used as a basis for geometry:

http://origametry.net/omfiles/geoconst.html

IIRC, you can do things that are impossible in standard Euclidean construction, such as squaring the circle. It also has more axioms than Euclidean construction, so maybe it's not a completely fair comparison.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

There are ways they can work around it, but their lead developer was drafted into their country's military. Ultimately, they're going to have to make their own phone, and it looks like they're making plans to do that.

For now, it's fine.

view more: next ›