fsmacolyte

joined 1 year ago
[–] fsmacolyte@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Funny how "self awareness" has two meanings here. It's the essence of what makes humans the smartest animals, but the problem you're referring to—lack of self reflection—is one of the most common problems amongst people today. Common sense ain't so common.

[–] fsmacolyte@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Sure, in the short term. I've switched to DDG and I'm not getting another Pixel when I need a new phone, and hoards of tech savvy people are feeling the same way. Dissatisfaction is causing them to lose customers and talent.

Eventually, they'll start feeling it in their bottom line. And by then it might be too late to change course.

[–] fsmacolyte@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

what in particular shows that Gary Marcus is uniformed? I dislike him because he's dogmatic and petty but I haven't seen a specific thing he's been wrong about, but I'd love examples.

[–] fsmacolyte@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Intent is part of it as well. If you have too many people who want to use your service, you're not being attacked, you have an actual shortage of ability to service requests and need to adjust accordingly.

[–] fsmacolyte@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm going to use those things as answer machines and you can't stop me.

Jokes aside, I always validate what chatbots tell me, not even just important things. I use GPT-4 for work and 90% of the time it can show me how to use very specific functions in complex ways, but yesterday (for the first time in awhile) it made up a function that didn't exist. To its credit, I said, "Are you sure about [function]?" and it said, "I'm sorry, I got confused. That function doesn't exist. However, look into X, Y, Z for further resources" and I did and they were the correct things to look into.

[–] fsmacolyte@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

The best ones can literally write pretty good code, and explain any concept on the Internet to you that you ask them to. If you don't understand a specific thing about their explanation, they can add onto their explanation, and they can respond in the style you want (explain as if I'm ten, explain as if I'm an undergrad, etc).

I use it literally every day for work in a somewhat niche field. I don't really agree that it's a "parlor trick".

[–] fsmacolyte@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

I was kind of with you until saying they're "being a fucking idiot."

Encouraging someone to help out? Great.

Browbeating someone for voicing the viewpoint or experience a lot of users are facing? We can do better than that.

[–] fsmacolyte@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Fascinating that people with stutters can be helped by practicing speaking with speech jammers.

It makes me think about how ADHD medication will make people without ADHD more distractible while it'll help focus people with it.

[–] fsmacolyte@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

John Wayne Gacy is really unhappy with this feature.

[–] fsmacolyte@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Old-school AI systems from way back in the day called Expert Systems were just a crapload of IF statements. There's never been a concrete agreed-upon definition of AI because there's never been an agreed-upon definition of the word Intelligence.

[–] fsmacolyte@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Look, I found your original point interesting, but if there was a major upset in the microwave industry, then that would belong in the technology section of a news site too.

view more: next ›