ghost_of_faso3

And why should I believe anything you say?

Is it that inconceivable someone onlines been to HK or Shenzhen to you lmao, they are both cities of several million people and HK being a colony of the UK has free travel between UK>HK.

I met someone in the UK who was HK-British, her parents where a split of HK/Mainlander, allowed me to travel between the two and I had employment for about 6 months in HK as a chef; during that time I was able to speak to a lot of people.

You could just like, fucking talk to someone from Shenzhen man, no ones stopping you.

Yes, Yes.

You dont understand the appeal of watching big, bald muscly men wrestle and fight one another?

Brother...

Every single Chinese person ive ever met (i've lived in Shenzen and I know a few in the UK) has been open to discussing what happened there what are you on about lmao

If something is free, you're the product.

I don’t really see a strong difference ultimately between “heavily disincentivizing” and banning

You dont see the difference between a tax break vs literally jailing people who have kids? Its a pretty big difference!

Thats because the one child policy was coerced by the IVF in order for China to survive during a period of economic isolation, more so the one child policy only applied to han Chinese, and many still choose to have children, it wasn't a ban on having extra children, they where just heavily disincentivized and given access too birth control.

Literally banning who can have sex would be eugenics yes

Thats why we have laws against rape and murder but not against having kids, because that would be eugenics.

mfw having to explain cognitive bias based on ideological state apparatus to someone who doesnt care

Good thing the CPC put a roadblock on that path and diverted us back into the morally grey middle road then.

He also did actual time for it and everyone involved was banned from practicing medicine in China, even despite the fact they are the core of CRISPR technology at the moment, they still care enough about ethics to not support this.

Seems like a case of one rogue team of people deciding what they where doing was for the moral good and then the state checking them.

We can still see the initial intentions as being morally good, and the outcome of it being gray but punished; its a balanced perspective; a lot of people here seem to have the impression it was approved by the CPC when it wasnt.

But that would mean independent thinking, which is frowned upon by tankies.

Not like you my independent, free thinker who regurgitates all narratives slurped out of the arsehole of the upper classes media conglomerates, your thoughts and race realism theories on the inherent evilness of countries that your free thinking mind has decided to dehumanize and other despite not actually knowing the reality of it outside of what you read; you are the true thinker!

Tell me more about how you've come to the conclusion that the CPC doesnt care about its own internal rule of law or defacto punishments after the fact despite the article suggesting nothing of the sort; im sure it will enlighten me in a way me or my tankie comrades havent considered. (Lets ignore the fact the CPC imprisoned the person who did this and banned his colleagues from ever practicing medicine, as the facts of this dont matter to you, only the headline that you can infer to confirm your advanced kkklan race realism theory)