ghost_of_faso3

joined 3 months ago
[–] ghost_of_faso3@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 4 days ago

There are tens of millions of communists world wide, what are you on about?

[–] ghost_of_faso3@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 4 days ago

So please try to study something first about communism in Eastern Europe before you start to celebrare this regime.

If anyone has a sincere interests in studying this in detail its other communists, perhaps you should do more study on modern conceptions of communism (China) and the informative post made by Cowbee.

[–] ghost_of_faso3@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 5 days ago

'It doesnt scale up'

China has the largest high speed rail network on the planet?

[–] ghost_of_faso3@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

And why should I believe anything you say?

Is it that inconceivable someone onlines been to HK or Shenzhen to you lmao, they are both cities of several million people and HK being a colony of the UK has free travel between UK>HK.

I met someone in the UK who was HK-British, her parents where a split of HK/Mainlander, allowed me to travel between the two and I had employment for about 6 months in HK as a chef; during that time I was able to speak to a lot of people.

You could just like, fucking talk to someone from Shenzhen man, no ones stopping you.

[–] ghost_of_faso3@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

You dont understand the appeal of watching big, bald muscly men wrestle and fight one another?

Brother...

[–] ghost_of_faso3@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Every single Chinese person ive ever met (i've lived in Shenzen and I know a few in the UK) has been open to discussing what happened there what are you on about lmao

[–] ghost_of_faso3@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If something is free, you're the product.

[–] ghost_of_faso3@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don’t really see a strong difference ultimately between “heavily disincentivizing” and banning

You dont see the difference between a tax break vs literally jailing people who have kids? Its a pretty big difference!

[–] ghost_of_faso3@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Thats because the one child policy was coerced by the IVF in order for China to survive during a period of economic isolation, more so the one child policy only applied to han Chinese, and many still choose to have children, it wasn't a ban on having extra children, they where just heavily disincentivized and given access too birth control.

Literally banning who can have sex would be eugenics yes

[–] ghost_of_faso3@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Thats why we have laws against rape and murder but not against having kids, because that would be eugenics.

[–] ghost_of_faso3@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

mfw having to explain cognitive bias based on ideological state apparatus to someone who doesnt care

view more: next ›