gun

joined 3 years ago
9
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by gun@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml
 

I couldn't find much information on this online, so I was wondering if anyone has any similar experience.

I have a machine with Void Linux installed, which uses Runit. I have installed greetd which works with agreety, but I'm trying to test out gtkgreet. Setting up greetd to run gtkgreet in cage gives me errors. Fair enough, I am certain I misconfigured something.

The issue is when I try to switch to a different terminal. Seems like the greetd from XBPS on runit wants to refresh every second once it fails. So until the config is rewritten to launch a command that works, it will constantly spam the same error messages.

Again, this would be okay, but when I switch to a different terminal, it seems to pull me back every time there's a new error message, which is every second, making it very difficult to login or do anything on those other terminals.

This is pretty disastrous and borderline locks me out of my computer, so I wanted to hear if this situation sounded familiar to anyone.

Edit: Seems there are two configurations for greeter sessions, the default_session and the initial_session. Putting the cage gtkgreet in the initial session, and not the default session, prevents the issue, because the initial_session only gets attempted once. This is still weird to me especially since the resources I was using suggested using cage gtkgreet under the default session.

[–] gun@lemmy.ml 17 points 6 months ago

There are some things that do change. In my case, it says my window manager is sway when it is actually river. So certain things will stop working as expected if it is not maintained. This is different from a game, because as systems change, it doesn't affect how the game works if the platform it runs on can be emulated. In a sense, the game is still being updated because the emulators required to use it are being updated.

[–] gun@lemmy.ml 37 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm not against bloat, I just want it to be MY bloat

[–] gun@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago

Lee-bruh

This is how I always sounded it in my head. Issue is, it sounds exactly like "libra"

[–] gun@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago

This should apply to Windows 10 as well right? How soon will this take affect?

[–] gun@lemmy.ml 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

How else can it be interpreted?

Exponential increase that has been slow for decades, but is just now starting to ramp up?

[–] gun@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What does this have to do with anything?

[–] gun@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago
[–] gun@lemmy.ml 24 points 9 months ago (2 children)

This is a data collection strategy, not a feature

[–] gun@lemmy.ml 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don’t have to believe it. I’ve got the data to prove it.

Ok, this is hilarious! I actually dug into your data, but I didn't have to dig that deep to find you are COMPLETELY misreading it. Just read this from the FIRST PAGE:

Within the homeless population, people who are Black, FEMALE, and Hispanic have LOWER relative mortality risk than their white, male, and non-Hispanic counterparts.

So wait, your data which you used to dismiss the male homelessness issue by provocatively suggesting women were dying in the hundreds of thousands, actually shows the exact OPPOSITE?
I mean, I am not a statistician, I will be humble for a moment and accept the possibility that maybe I have misread something here, because this level of irony is hard for me to believe. I get things wrong sometimes! Where am I wrong? Point to me where in the data you can get away with saying that female homeless mortality is double. Make it make sense.

[–] gun@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

There are more living homeless men entirely because there are more dead homeless women.

You can't honestly believe this. The mortality rate is awful but it does not sufficiently explain why there are more men than women unhoused.

Edit: Turns out their own source debunks their claim on the first page. You can't make this stuff up.

[–] gun@lemmy.ml -3 points 11 months ago
view more: next ›