CIFS is SMB under a diferent name, and it might be that inside a share you can hardlink, but not across shares in the same filesystem.
gvasco
joined 1 year ago
Current world politicians are so tech illitirare it's bewildering. Supposedly they have experts and think tanks at their disposal to help them in these sorts of endeavours, for what? It's insane how much survailance has been ranked up in the past decade.
one caveat is the need for *rr apps to have direct access to the storage filesystem, and not connect through some filesharing protocol (smb, NFS, etc..) afaik. ISCSI might be good since it's presented as an actual system drive, speculating.
A shitshow! /s
Unfortunately, there's a majority of people posting without exhausting their research so unless you mention in your post what you have done, anyone else can't assume anything at the risk of providing unhelpful info. "Assumption is the mother of all fuckups."
Running /e/ OS on a 1+ 7 Pro
It's planned for an upcoming update, if you read the release notes it's mentioned in there.
Edit: the release notes on the latest version
Breaking the plastic would be tough so long as you're not hammering it. The connectors crimped to the wires it's another issue and if you pull too hard you could get the wire to come off the connector if it isn't soldered.
With high enough voltage everything becomes conductive.
Looks just as isolated as a lot of us.
To the internet? Heck, to the whole world, if it weren't for shareholders, profits and taxes, climate measures to curb climate change could be more aggressive.
It's neither, it's a limitation of SMB, if you have multiple shares set-up that mount to the root of the SMB share, you can't hardlink accross them, but inside a single share in the root of the SMB share apparently it's not an issue.