hanrahan

joined 2 years ago
[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 months ago

No need to worry, next decade 35! Enjoy the 30 while you can. To misquote Yazz, "The only way is up! Baby'

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 6 points 4 months ago

Yeah this is stupid, don't do that and create more emissions and pollution (tire and brake particulates) for shits and giggles.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I am aure they'd rather be busy doing other things but if the Governmwnt starts taking liberties and shits on the Constitution, then we need someone to step up to the plate.. Shame on the Government.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

I'll never understabd why there's not

*light,

*dark

*and system

for themes ffs

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 months ago

Am I the only one that never has BT swit he'd on ? 99.9% of the time it's off.

I don't use wirleias headphones and don't have much use for BT at all..

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 months ago

There was an excellent allegory for this from Tamino many years ago that stuck with me. For those not in the know, he's a statistician who works with climate scientists (amongst other things) like Professor Stefan Rhamstorf

https://tamino.wordpress.com/2016/02/03/how-to-destroy-a-megalopolis/

In fact I did it every day. One large pot of boiling hot water. The idea wasn’t to kill all the ants, or to eradicate their megalopolis in one crushing blow. The idea was simply to make it too costly, in terms of energy and time, for their complex of ant cities to be sustainable.

It worked.

After about two weeks, the ants were gone. Completely. I believe they just couldn’t stay there any more, it was just too difficult with such regular demands on repair. I don’t know whether the megalopolis died out, or they moved to a different location. But any way you look at it, I succeeded in destroying their megalopolis, because amid the continual assault of disasters, they simply weren’t able to keep up.

This is what can happen to us. Global warming isn’t going to come in one astounding assault and kill us all with one blow. It’s just going to make survival harder — a lot harder — with regular assaults like floods, droughts, heat waves, killer storms.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 months ago

On my mobile I use a pixel 4, I tried Graphene OS but my banking failed so back to stock Android

Here in Australia I just use a physical card for tap and go for payments etc or use cash. No need for Google Pay or bank payments app. Can log in via my bank via a web browser to move cash about or check spending.

I think you demonstrated the entire point, people prefer invasive convenience over privacy., along with flimsy justification. Not having a go, it's exactly what most people say when I query them about privacy, "It's so much eaaier and how I manage" etc etc.

Then we have your FB messenger thing. Dead lord, stop that. If they don't want to chat to me on Signal, they're obviously not my friend.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If we want to have a stable livable climate we need to.live with the emissions of the average Cuban (Professor Kevin Anderson) That allows the worlds poorest to have more emissions per capita and the worlds richest to come down a lot, and by a lot I mean a metric shit load.

How we do that and what that looks like is up to us but if we don't soon, we'll likely collapse. civilisation anyway and none if it will matter and we won't be talking about it on here.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 23 points 4 months ago

Good on them, modern day heroes.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The defence against your claim is the Tolerance Paradox

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 months ago

Same here in Australia? I'm 57, I'm one of the youngest around, dude I bought the place off was 87 and moving into a retirement hone.

view more: ‹ prev next ›