hydroptic

joined 1 year ago
[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

100% guaranteed she believes in a white Jesus and would go into apoplectic conservative rage if you pointed out good 'ol Jebus was brown

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago

Requiring people to use their real name would take out a lot of the noise, the false and misleading info, and the unqualified opinions that people are blasting out into the ether, and then other people who don’t know any better find it and feel with their ape brains that their own malformed opinions and emotions are validated.

But requiring all internet users to identify (somehow, let's leave the implementation aside for now) would also mean that anyone living in a repressive regime would be even more fucked than they are now, and it'd mean that even people living in at least nominally democratic countries but with a nonzero amount of violent conservatives would be an easier target, since there'd be no pseudonymity.

As to your last point, we are definitely not cognitively equipped for what we have. Can we equip ourselves now, after the fact?

Frankly I doubt it. The cat is out of the bag, and I really don't know how we can unfuck this situation – at least without significant amounts of social upheaval and bloodshed in the interim

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Right, it's only 2/4 "I can't believe it's not real fascism" + 1/4 "we'd be ok with concentration camps as long as they were privately funded" + 1/4 "we'd be ok with concentration camps as long as the signs are in Swedish and Finnish" which is much better. Especially the National Coalition Party is more or less indistinguishable from the Finns Party, and they've made it exceedingly clear that they're 100% fine with bigotry and many of their members are exactly as bigoted as the worst of PS / KD.

When the PM whines about how the opposition makes Finland look bad by talking to foreign press about literal fucking neo-Nazis in the fucking government, and makes several proclamations about how they won't stand for racism which is believable for about 4h until the next PS or KOK member says something incredibly racist, it's not exaclty going to inspire me to believe that the majority of people voting for those shitbags don't endorse this behavior as well

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

If ~50% of the voting age population supports an extremist right wing government (pretending they're not extremists is pointless when we have had eg. multiple governmental neo-Nazi PR flaps and the Speaker of the Parliament has said he's a "proud Aryan") and we're statistically one of the most racist countries in Europe, and immigrants have a notoriously hard time finding anything but menial jobs, I'm not sure what sort of other conclusions you can draw? Well, aside from blaming it all on the immigrants and proving my point, of course.

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

Good luck with that.

Finland is a deeply racist country and our current far-right government has exactly zero interest in worker demands in general – to the point of limiting people's right to strike – and they're going to be especially unsympathetic to pleas from people working for food courier platforms as they're generally immigrants. The platforms themselves have zero interest in paying people more, as that would likely mean fewer customers and worse revenue.

Nkunda is right in saying that jobs like this are pretty much the only ones many immigrants can get, and this is by design. Most companies won't hire immigrants (around 50% of our population is extremely conservative and very racist), so the only options left are exploitative jobs that are more or less tailored for immigrants – low pay and terrible conditions that nobody who has a choice really wants to accept.

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I’m against innocent people being killed. I’m sorry that upsets you.
[…]
You can get angry at me because I don’t like that, but that’s just another lack of compassion, and I won’t be surprised.

cries about people being rude

makes weird jabs about formatting when their hypocrisy is pointed out

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

People like him make it clear that we're soon going to be in a "us or them" situation here – these people literally want to murder leftists, 50% of the country's voting age population supports them (and distressingly the youth vote went to the right), and their rhetoric is getting more and more violent by the day.

This current government is normalizing fascist speech and tactics, and it won't be too long until talk of some sort of final solution to the leftist question will be completely normal, and after that it won't be too long until they actually start implementing it. Unfortunately the majority of people who are willing to use political violence are conservatives, because like I said, soon it's going to be us or them.

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Unfortunately the voting system is the only sane part about Finland. Our current government is so far right that it includes multiple literal neo-Nazis and a pedophile neo-Nazi (who stepped in to replace a neo-Nazi), and multiple ministers (well ok, a minister and the Speaker of the Parliament) have fantasized in public about murdering eg. gay people or foreigners. The Speaker of the Parliament is also one of the right wing mass murderer Breivik's idols, and has obliquely spoken in support of Breivik's act of terror.

This place is a conservative shithole and I suggest anyone considering a vacation here to go somewhere else, especially if you're not white or cishet

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I’m against innocent people being killed. I’m sorry that upsets you.
[…]
You can get angry at me because I don’t like that, but that’s just another lack of compassion, and I won’t be surprised.

cries about people being rude

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (10 children)

I’m against innocent people being killed. I’m sorry that upsets you.
[…]
You can get angry at me because I don’t like that, but that’s just another lack of compassion, and I won’t be surprised.

If you think your stance is more moral than others' and would like for people to agree with you, have you tried not being a complete cunt about it?

I have no dog in this race since I live in a country with a sane voting system, so you can spare me your performative moral outrage.

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Some of the worst shitbags in the world are online proudly under their own names.

Anonymity isn't the problem. Instant mass communication between creatures with plains ape brains is the problem. We are not cognitively equipped for this shit.

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Why is a flawed democracy preferable to other systems? Why are we convinced that democracy is the only way to run a society? It's not like the only other possible options are autocratic dictatorships, we just refuse to entertain the thought that maybe letting idiots decide how to run a country maybe isn't optimal

 

Ignition! is part memoir and part history book from the 70's, written by John D. Clark who was an American rocket fuel chemist.

It doesn't go too deep into the chemistry side of things, so even if you're like me and don't understand that side at all you might enjoy reading it if you're into space history nerdery. Clark had a pretty hilarious writing style, so it's a surprisingly entertaining book considering the subject matter. As an example, here's what he had to say about chlorine trifluoride:

All this sounds fairly academic and innocuous, but when it is translated into the problem of handling the stuff, the results are horrendous. It is, of course, extremely toxic, but that's the least of the problem. It is hypergolic with every known fuel, and so rapidly hypergolic that no ignition delay has ever been measured. It is also hypergolic with such things as cloth, wood, and test engineers, not to mention asbestos, sand, and water — with which it reacts explosively. It can be kept in some of the ordinary structural metals — steel, copper, aluminum, etc. — because of the formation of a thin film of insoluble metal fluoride which protects the bulk of the metal, just as the invisible coat of oxide on aluminum keeps it from burning up in the atmosphere. If, however, this coat is melted or scrubbed off, and has no chance to reform, the operator is confronted with the problem of coping with a metal-fluorine fire. For dealing with this situation, I have always recommended a good pair of running shoes.

 

A video about the Minuteman ICBM's guidance computer by Alexander the ok.

He even made a simulator for it, in case you want to try out what it would have been like to program an ICBM's guidance computer in the 60's 😁

 
 
 

Opinion piece by professor of political science Alexander J. Motyl.

A synopsis of sorts from the first few paragraphs:

Analysts of Russia differ about many things, but the most important difference concerns their interpretation of the roots of Russia’s ongoing aggression. One side argues that Russian history and political culture are to blame — or, to put it more simply, uniquely Russian characteristics are the cause of Russian aggression. The other side argues that the causes are not uniquely Russian, but typical of the behavior of certain kinds of states, regimes, societies and leaders.

Unsurprisingly, historians of Russia and Ukraine tend to fall into the first camp, while political scientists with a comparative bent tend to fall into the second camp. Equally unsurprisingly, the first camp sees no easy solutions to Russia’s current behavior, precisely because it’s just a continuation of an age-old pattern of Russian behavior inspired by the inalterable Russian soul.

[…]

In contrast, social scientists are often somewhat more bullish about Russia’s prospects of change. Other countries have abandoned centuries of authoritarianism, so why not Russia? It may not be easy, but it’s surely possible, with the right array of policies and under the appropriate conditions.

[…]

So, who’s right? Alas, both perspectives are, and that’s why there is no easy answer to the problem of Russian imperialism.

 
 
 
 

cross-posted from: https://sopuli.xyz/post/10010650

Ran into this on HN and had to share it. I love esolangs with "surprising" source representations

 

Part from a French safe lock

 

[…] What is surprising is how poorly we still understand global ant societies: there is a science-fiction epic going on under our feet, an alien geopolitics being negotiated by the 20 quadrillion ants living on Earth today. It might seem like a familiar story, but the more time I spend with it, the less familiar it seems, and the more I want to resist relying on human analogies. Its characters are strange; its scales hard to conceive. Can we tell the story of global ant societies without simply retelling our own story?

[…] Recognition looks very different for humans and insects. Human society relies on networks of reciprocity and reputation, underpinned by language and culture. Social insects – ants, wasps, bees and termites – rely on chemical badges of identity. In ants, this badge is a blend of waxy compounds that coat the body, keeping the exoskeleton watertight and clean. The chemicals in this waxy blend, and their relative strengths, are genetically determined and variable. This means that a newborn ant can quickly learn to distinguish between nest mates and outsiders as it becomes sensitive to its colony’s unique scent. Insects carrying the right scent are fed, groomed and defended; those with the wrong one are rejected or fought.

[…] It is remarkable how irresistible the language of human warfare and empire can be when trying to describe the global history of ant expansion. Most observers – scientists, journalists, others – seem not to have tried. Human efforts to control ants are regularly described as a war, as is competition between invaders and native ants, and it is easy to see why comparisons are made between the spread of unicolonial ant societies and human colonialism. People have been drawing links between insect and human societies for millennia. But what people see says more about them than about insects.

 

The street sweeper has a decent work-life balance. She takes her job very seriously. She guides her broom with intent, and her gaze is directed at the ground at all times. She sweeps meticulously, almost gingerly even. There is one particular spot she pays special attention to. For over two and a half hours she does nothing but sweep this one small area. And yet, all the effort doesn’t lead to any visible changes. No matter how diligently she sweeps, the sidewalk remains dusty and full of dried mud.

[…] Does the launderess dream of her desires, of the things she might see or become? Does she work this hard because she believes it is her job that will emancipate her? Turn her dreams into reality, some day, at the terminal station of her infinite loop of labor performance?

view more: ‹ prev next ›