ibot

joined 6 months ago
[–] ibot@feddit.org 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Telegram: Someone threatened to kill me and my family if I don't transfer them my username. Some people are so sick.

[–] ibot@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago

Are you my brother?

I am Crispy Chicken Burgerius!

[–] ibot@feddit.org 135 points 5 days ago

No discussion, it is super shitty that someone stole the money.

But the real scandal is, that anybody needs to raise money, to get a cancer treatment.

[–] ibot@feddit.org 4 points 2 weeks ago

Same here. I really like it and bought the Premium version already to support the developer. It's not on the same level of customization and not as feature rich as Nova, but it's quite nice. And it's under active development.

[–] ibot@feddit.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

Damn.I need to find an alternative. I also like the Microsoft Launcher, but it's Microsoft...

[–] ibot@feddit.org 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I think, because of Fedoras atomic desktops. I didn't use any of them yet, but it seems like Flatpaks should be used there, since one should (or can?) not install tradional packages there. Therefore Fedora provides the flatpaks anyway and they can be used on the non atomic desktops as well.

Another reason is, that you might not be able to install the latest version of an application as rpm package if a required dependency in the repo is outdated. A Flatpak usually does not have the issue since a newer version would include the fitting runtime. This said, I do think its not this big of an issue for fedora which is usually quite up to date. But if you run a distribution with LTS releases or something like Debian you will much more likely have older dependencies in your repositiry.