jman6495

joined 1 year ago
[–] jman6495@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

A modern UI for ClamAV or a Subsonic Music Streaming client (In gtk4)

[–] jman6495@lemmy.ml 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

My recommendation would be Fedora or CentOS if you want a stable workstation you won't have to reinstall. Debian is also a great choice. OpenSUSE Tumbleweed is okay but I found it a little clunky compared to the others. Avoid EndevourOS and Manjaro like the plague.

[–] jman6495@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 months ago

This article sounds extremely fishy and borderline conspiracy-like to me.

Imho the only guarantee of privacy I need is the source code.

[–] jman6495@lemmy.ml 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but if you intend to mainly use flatpak you might want to try fedora Silverblue

[–] jman6495@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No, you can't : in an immutable distro I can reasonably trace almost any file in the filesystem back to the package that created it, and know with a reasonable degree of certainty that the installed version of said file has not been tampered with. That isn't possible an a normal distro.

[–] jman6495@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Please do share with me what I do not understand.

A mostly read only filesystem built from a limited number of packages, with other files being in a fixed number of locations mean it is harder for malware to hide.

[–] jman6495@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

Very good choice :D

[–] jman6495@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

I used to daily drive arch, until university, when I got frustrated at the issues it caused me and the time I needed to solve them.

I'd recommend fedora if you want real solid stability.

[–] jman6495@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago (13 children)

I don't think the DE itself matters, but I can recommend using an immutable OS (makes it harder to install malware) and installing flatpak apps only. You can also use software like flatseal to further lock down permissions

[–] jman6495@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There is so much wrong with this post. Half of the points raised are utter bullshit

[–] jman6495@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

We have to wait and see for eIDAS, let's hope with the changes to eIDAS dead, we'll have at least a few years of the Commission not proposing some dumb surveillance shit

[–] jman6495@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

The latest text has not yet been released, but when it is you will see a separation between Identification and Encryption. It is also clearly stated that browsers are allowed to do whatever they want regarding recognition of CAs for encryption. tl;dr the status quo for encryption (linking a domain to a server) does not change, browsers will only be forced to recognise identity (linking a organisation to a server). This will force a re-engineering of QWACs/EV certs in general in favour of something like ntqwacs.

view more: next ›