kryllic

joined 1 year ago
[–] kryllic@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

This is correct

[–] kryllic@programming.dev 17 points 1 year ago

You enjoy Linux to freely use your machine. I use it to make the cow say funny thing. We are not the same.

[–] kryllic@programming.dev 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Linus Torvalds gets those reports and puts you on the naughty list

[–] kryllic@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago

I think that's usually the type of person who puts themselves out there in the public's eye to be consumed though

[–] kryllic@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Honestly thought it was clickhole content

[–] kryllic@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Isn't Piped in a bit of limbo atm due to Google ip banning proxy servers?

[–] kryllic@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

It should be no more taxing than a web page, so I think you're correct. I have both apps and haven't done a direct performance comparison, but I will say the PWA seems to be just a tad snappier, imo

[–] kryllic@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It stands for Progressive Web App. It allows websites to be treated as a standalone app without having to download it from a storefront. When done well, it's hardly distinguishable from a proper native app. It's a cost-efficient way to create a cross-platform app that works with basically any browser.

[–] kryllic@programming.dev 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Voyager 100%, nearly perfect PWA, great as a native iOS app too.

[–] kryllic@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Seconding this, Proton has been super easy to work with, and the ProtonPass alias feature just works beautifully

[–] kryllic@programming.dev 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

YouTube was supposed to be that, and it was well on its way back in like 2010 with animators, then they changed their algorithm and method of tallying payment to creators and shut out any type of channel that created work that took a while to manufacture.

view more: ‹ prev next ›