Cream of Rice, soup, and mashed sweet potatoes.
lemonmelon
Taking that cynicism one step further: JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs are both heavily pushing RTO mandates. Altering the optics of their DEI position can make them seem more welcoming to those who would benefit, thereby increasing the size of the pool of replacements for the remote workers they plan to dismiss.
You missed the other commenter's point entirely. They're referring to the total size of the dating pool and the need to filter that down to something that is both more manageable to interact with and more likely to lead to interactions with interested parties. The goal shouldn't be "as many dates as possible", rather "as many potentially compatible dates as possible". Without winnowing down the size of the potential search group, one would be far less likely to have a meaningful, favorable encounter on any hypothetical date.
The Utah DLD has easily found information on their website regarding mental health and driving privileges. On dld.utah.gov/drivers, under the section "Medical Standards for Drivers" you can find a list of medical categories pertaining to drivers. Specifically, Category G relates directly to mental health, and seems to entrust health care providers with broad discretionary power per my reading.
If you have more trouble navigating their site than I did, the direct link to the .pdf detailing the safety levels associated with Category G is https://dld.utah.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/17/2024/08/Category-G-2024.pdf.
There are few discussions I have in my daily life that can't be made more entertaining by adding "If not, there's always trebuchets."
Thank you for enriching my future conversations!
I'll bite. Do you want an actual answer, or do you just want the opportunity to publicly clutch your pearls?
It's been in my tea, hasn't it?
This is Ash erasure, and I won't have it.
Take it one step further...
Hint
Mercury instead of Lincoln
Then we grind them to a fine powder...