That was my first thought, but these are algorithmically/procedurally driven, not AI driven. Which makes them highly reliable, configurable, and consistent. Unlike AI machines which will hallucinate cup holders everywhere that are too large or too small to hold any actual cup.
luthis
Ah I see. Well it's like the old saying goes, "I'd rather pay a ton of money to get AI robots to fuck everything up really badly and then go back to paying workers a barely livable wage, than pay workers a livable wage in the first place and not waste a ton of money."
One broken system is enough..
They've figured out how to convert AI outputs into electricity??
As a kiwi, I'm sorry you guys only have a binary choice.
My 2 cents without really knowing much: much:
Harris- only good by comparison Won't make the major changes necessary not very funny
Trump- Orange Hilarious Has some good ideas on bringing jobs back
Is the direction of rotation in the room with us right now?
Lutris can be pretty handy for many things..
I don't have too much exp with these things, but I would suggest (as an IT support person) narrowing down and isolating problems into specifics, like:
- I need dot.net for x thing and I tried y thing and it didn't work.
You'll be able to get better answers. I'm pretty interested in the suggestions, my usual solution is 'find something open source that is not as good but works.'
There should be an app or something for this..
I... actually can't tell if you're taking the piss or if that's a real episode.
I have so many questions about the whales.
Tarballs are not built from source?
I have heard multiple times from different sources that building from git source instead of using tarballs invalidates this exploit, but I do not understand how. Is anyone able to explain that?
If malicious code is in the source, and therefore in the tarball, what's the difference?
My money is on doing nothing at all is enough for them to royally screw up.