min0nim

joined 1 year ago
[–] min0nim@aussie.zone 25 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This is one area where Apple has it pretty right. A Mac will do somethings when ‘asleep’ like download emails and texts. It also can broadcast its location if the ‘Find Me’ function is on. If it’s plugged into power then backups will also run, and background app updates will happen. It does this in a low power mode, so it won’t get hot enough to need fans. It’s worked flawlessly for 20 years. Meanwhile all our PCs are set to ‘never sleep’ and just get shutdown when not in use. I never trust a PC laptop to wake successfully from sleep just by closing the lid.

[–] min0nim@aussie.zone 2 points 11 months ago

It’s not even quite that - the article suggested they raised the commercial equivalent of the 12% through competitive auction. These allow the bidders a set price over 20 years.

So it’s cheaper than buying in fossil fuels, the suppliers get certainty, and they achieve close to complete decarbonisation using private investment.

How good is that?

[–] min0nim@aussie.zone 5 points 11 months ago

It’s a big WHOOOSH, but I actually do respect all the people getting as far as reading ‘https://twit…’… and saying ‘fuck that’.

[–] min0nim@aussie.zone -1 points 11 months ago

No. Hydrogen peroxide is the best disinfectant. Beats sunlight by a long long margin.

Bleaching Nazis on the internet is basically what OP is calling for, and by your own analogy, they’re right.

[–] min0nim@aussie.zone 3 points 11 months ago

Maximally hilarious.

[–] min0nim@aussie.zone 18 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The whole premise of ads on Twitter is that they’re targeted.

IBM don’t sell consumer crap. They sell smoke and mirrors to major governments and industry. They’re chasing jobs worth millions per pop. They want ads to target the people making those decisions.

[–] min0nim@aussie.zone 23 points 11 months ago

Weird take, what’s your beef? They most certainly do slap on huge fines, and are much more aggressive about enforcing privacy requirements than the US/etal.

This is kinda like cursing the worlds fastest sprinter for just not running fast enough.

[–] min0nim@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

I don’t see this being very popular in Australia. It misses the mark for why people buy a Ute or dual cab here.

[–] min0nim@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago

“We just throw all the money up into the air, and what god wants he takes, and leaves the rest to us.”

[–] min0nim@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Full title - “Amiga runs schools’ air-conditioning, maintenance staffs’ chip tune releases, and the janitor’s Dungeon Master addiction”.

[–] min0nim@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can do this but it makes them even more expensive, because you’ve built an expensive plant for operational capacity that you don’t use.

We should be load following with storage, not nukes.

[–] min0nim@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago

In places where this has been studied extensively renewables with storage are still the cheapest by a long way. Australia has the whole state of South Australia (plus Tasmania) as a test case. SA has transitioned to almost 100% renewable supply in under a decade.

We have a cost effective, distributed, redundant, easy to build solution. SMRs are not proven in cost or reliability. They should be studied and trialed, but not at the expense of acting responsibly today.

view more: next ›