minorkeys

joined 1 year ago
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Wtf is going on?

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Gaining power often means loosening of morals and ethics, removing the constraints on behaviors in order to be capable of doing what is effective. All these people are in a club where they're all criminals because that's how power works.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

The masses won't do shit.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

So if everyone in power is in on it, who is there to hold any of them accountable?

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Yes there are. They just don't make it through the gauntlet to reach power since they don't desire it to begin with.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hated both lead characters.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

If someone punched you in the face you'd be allowed to fight back. If the government dooms you to economic death, you're supposed to just accept it. America is incredibly cruel...

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There is zero chance my brain knows what any of that actually means in practice.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

So they can open an investigation on everyone they want to protect and give themselves the justification to redact any info in the files. Since nobody sees the unredacted files, nobody can confirm if the info is part of an investigation? I mean this is the kind of shit people with a brain were saying would happen when the division of powers and the roles of the branches aren't upheld.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

How can service members be confident enough that the order is illegal, to refuse it, or believe adhering to their oath offers any protection from retaliation?

view more: next ›