mouserat

joined 2 years ago
[–] mouserat@discuss.tchncs.de 34 points 4 months ago

utterly deranged

[–] mouserat@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Same... when I write a mail at work I usually add details so my forgetful ass can look up what I did later, in case I need to reproduce the task. It's not necessarily important to the recipients.

[–] mouserat@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 months ago

I hope this will blow up even though they try to mute any unwanted news with their continuously ongoing creation of brown noise.

[–] mouserat@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 months ago

You're right-I didn't want to make it look simple. I'm just constantly stunned how wealth is distributed, which is one of many reasons for homelessness. A fair distribution could finance housing and support systems.

[–] mouserat@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 4 months ago (4 children)

And the wealth of only one single manchild is enough to pay housing for them all - at least in this nation...and probably in some more. (Just looked some numbers up - world economic forum reported in 2021 that there are 150 million people homeless in the world, that would be ~2700,- per individual homeless person, taking his net worth into account -for 770. 000 homeless people in the US it would be ~525. 000 per person)

[–] mouserat@discuss.tchncs.de 164 points 5 months ago (4 children)
[–] mouserat@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 5 months ago

He seems to actually believe there is a way to live forever. And he's spending millions per year to get there. He said he wants to show the world how to stop ageing. When asked how everybody should be able to spend as much resources as he does, he said society has to figure that out. Besides the fact that cost-intense trestments will only benefit the wealthy there wasn't one word about overall resource management, when people will die much later, but babies are born continuously. And the sentence about society has to figure it out really made me angry. Society already figured out billionairs are an issue and often enough the cause for many poor people suffering. But this doesn't change anything, cause the rich make the rules.

[–] mouserat@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 5 months ago

Completely agree, but my guess is they want one, but struggle with the information about the health status. Without knowing what the issue is, it's hard to say what my decision would be. But "your body, your choice" is always true and nobody should be allowed to condemn you for your choice.

[–] mouserat@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Not sure if you refer to this accident, but Jeffrey knew too much and was a risk. Luigi is not a risk anymore, his followers are. And they would probably be fueled by his death.

[–] mouserat@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 6 months ago

Especially if this troll also compliment itself for being a good parent

[–] mouserat@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 7 months ago

I guess you refer to the next election? I hope there will be one

 

In my country it has been made easier to change the gender in your passport. I think it's a good step forward. But since this has officially been decided, multiple times people used the sentence above for any gender related issue, with derogatory attitude. For example when talking about quota of women at work or pay gaps. When I just look at them, because I'm missing a good response, they add something like "now it's easy, everyone can change it just as they like". I don't know how to concisely respond to this. There are multiple things wrong - as if discrimination would disappear by "changing" gender and the obvious dissent about it being a progressive step that everyone can decide for themselves now what the gender entry in their ID is. What would be a good short response in a situation like this?

view more: next ›