My producer, Neigsendoig, has some music you could use. Just search up [at]Neigsendoig using an Invidous instance, and put on a playlist or album of his music. He doesn't mind if people uses it as long as he's credited.
I'd only recommend the ones with CC BY as the license, and maybe you could use Wavlake in order to ensure you can credit him properly.
Neigsendoig (my producer) and I absolutely use the stones out of YouTube through Invidious, so we know a thing or two about clickbait (as we're both content creators, while I'm virtual in this context). Speaking of, clickbait to be clickbait (meaning, clickbait elements without any sort of valuable video) is completely sloppy, and AI loves that. After all, the YouTube algorithm clearly does something as an AI with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, megalomania, and a ton of other human mental health issues.
Clickbait titles without actual video behind it is a bad move, as I tend to watch more relationship YouTubers vs. idea YouTubers [that's an idea from Olli (Mumbo Jumbo) by the way]. Neigsendoig and I are on opposite sides of the spectrum, as I narrate for an idea YouTube channel.
That said, to your question on clickbait making one stop seeing a creator... for both Neigsendoig and I, it 100% does depending on the context, and the dualistic type I described earlier. While not the major problem, clickbait is certainly a huge problem on the platform. Now, I guess you want color in your thumbnails, though you might want more blue (I'm thinking house decoration here, as blue draws people in a lot) in your thumbnail. Neigsendoig has been known to do that in GIMP (libre Photoshop), and he's used quite a bit of yellow on blue.
For the case of good in clickbait, it depends on if the content is valuable for building out your life, or building out some ideas you want to make reality (Jack Spirko-style moment), which is what both Sendo (Neigsendoig) and I tend to do.
As for clickbait being necessary... I don't think so at all in terms of evil. That said, if you know how to do it right, you can make pleasing thumbnails without all the slop of it.
bluGill already noted that OP is a noob. He literally said:
as a noob you have a lot to learn the hard way.
What you did was take my comment slightly out of context. Fruit doesn't have refined sugars, though they have fructose (which is a sugar that's unrefined). If someone eats fruit, and they're not of the body type to do that, health problems could arise from it. What I was doing was paraphrasing from studies I've read on each of the things here that I've gone ahead and researched myself.
As for the milk thing, why do you think an Amish farmer was being railroaded for selling raw milk? That's because raw milk, when handled properly, is fantastic for the body without the need for it to be pasteurized. That's what he was doing, and daddy government didn't like that one bit, so they wanted to pull a ritual on him just to ensure they get the message of "raw milk bad". The goat's milk cheese I eat comes from raw goat milk, and I do fine with it, in my experience. Your mileage may vary.
I'd do poop flavored chocolate, point blank. I've prepared for that somewhat with bean boozled in my past, though there are some "gross" flavors I legitimately liked (dead fish tasting like salmon for me, for example).
The things you know they'll eat... that might be something I can't really understand. That's an unhealthy sweet tooth from the looks of things, and I wouldn't go for that.
The celery or cukes (cucumbers)? Well, I'd do "ants on a log" by putting a nut butter (I use an almond butter of sorts) in the celery channel, and then adding raisins on it (I hadn't had raisins in a long time, though). For the cukes, I have no idea how that could work.
Granola bars and cookies, unless they're free of gluten, cow's milk, refined sugars, soy or seed oils (seed oils are hard to find missing from something), I'd stay the heck away from (there is a good chocolate raspberry granola from Seven Sundays I like, though I just treat that like a cereal).
Instead, I'd do the above mentioned things (minus the things they'll eat). For my school lunches back in the day, I had some sort of meat item, seaweed, a drink (usually a refined sugar-free juice box)
That's what I thought as well. It's disgusting when someone leads and loads up a question with people who don't understand critical thinking sometimes.
Carnivore is fantastic for those who need to heal from health issues. It's expensive if you don't know what you're doing, but it's worth it once you study it.
I take it you're on a carnivore diet of some sort due to your eating disorder?
Plants actually cause a lot of health problems. For example...
Do we see why I tend to eat beef a lot, and avoid these feed ingredients whenever I eat certain plants?
I literally just called the uninformed position of "bad for the earth" out a little bit, and even have an anecdote of my positive personal experience eating meat. I get the sentiment for those who do eat meat, and get bullied just because they want to be healthy (while those who eat plants tend to have a lot of health issues, and can be overwight or obese by refined sugars, gluten, soy, seed oils and/or cow's milk that's GMO'd [a correlation some don't seem to get]).
Glad to see someone's on a similar page about it, as that's just some sort of silly thing to me.
That's been challenged by UMG or Warner I think.