narshee

joined 2 years ago
[–] narshee@iusearchlinux.fyi 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

No, because these things should be private. Social media however needs some kind of moderation. edit: also go blame the user too, but that should be a given

[–] narshee@iusearchlinux.fyi 6 points 2 years ago (9 children)

I think to blame/sue the company that is nearest to the user should work fine. (following is hyperbolical) If you don't do it that way, then yes it would be slippery because the big bang would need to be sued. But that makes no sense.

[–] narshee@iusearchlinux.fyi 8 points 2 years ago

What are other alternative popular sound servers besides these two?

ALSA; low level, not really recommended to use directly. JACK; professional audio. GStreamer; idk exactly. Pipewire supports applications using any of those.

[–] narshee@iusearchlinux.fyi 6 points 2 years ago

Well, the second one is more dystopian

[–] narshee@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

This is inaccurate. You are not buying it (the media), you are buying the right to stream it (as long as the seller provides the media as a stream). You don't "buy" a movie unless you are paying for it's ownership, which would be millions of dollars. For physical releases you buy the disk and the right to watch it under certain conditions (DRM). And you generally don't have a right be able to "buy" or have access to all media.

But all that doesn't automaticly make it amoral. ~~this comment is gonna be downvoted to hell~~

edit: There are probably gonna be more responces, so this will address everything else I have to say. What I wrote is how things are legally, more or less. I don't like that either. I do consider piracy stealing (under current laws) and morally right. Stealing is just not that great term for digital stuff. Please don't try to (uselessly) sway me and don't infight

view more: ‹ prev next ›