nebeker

joined 2 years ago
[–] nebeker@programming.dev 7 points 1 month ago

Let’s all just wait for the new versions of languages, frameworks and operating systems. LLMs won’t have been trained on those and won’t have answers, people not asking each other online will generate no answers to train on.

Let’s read and train on docs, right? Yeah, right.

[–] nebeker@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago

I’ve seen some very excited sponsor spots for them on YouTube. CDNs often make ads load faster than videos, so who knows what kind of innovations they could be financing. All of them perfectly privacy preserving, of course…

[–] nebeker@programming.dev 23 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Thanks, I was confused about why the helix editor might need screen sharing. Haha.

[–] nebeker@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

Sure, it’s:

123 Mulberry '); DROP TABLE Deliveries;--

[–] nebeker@programming.dev 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I love how the documentation is in the actual .h file and the read me is a mere formality.

I’m disappointed I didn’t get this as a floppy in the mail.

[–] nebeker@programming.dev 1 points 4 months ago

Isn’t that the point of languages like Snap?

[–] nebeker@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

A good reminder that composition is a useful concept.

[–] nebeker@programming.dev 2 points 5 months ago

I mean, if you want your prints to be asynchronous you’re looking for trouble to begin with.

The previous statement is a joke.

[–] nebeker@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago

Ah, yes: weaponizing cybersecurity requirements to trick - I mean “motivate” - higher management to do things “right.”

[–] nebeker@programming.dev 8 points 6 months ago

My thought as well, but those stones were shaped to match each other, reducing the amount of grout needed. It just goes to show the old ways still work, but you have to commit.

[–] nebeker@programming.dev 16 points 6 months ago (3 children)

This is a dangerous metaphor. Remove the old wall and it turns out the new beautiful wall was leaning against and supported by it.

I get what you mean, it’s just that the metaphor could support both perspectives.

[–] nebeker@programming.dev 3 points 7 months ago

Surely through an intermediate - real - language?

view more: next ›