nebeker

joined 2 years ago
[–] nebeker@programming.dev 7 points 1 week ago

I’ve taken to writing .http files which are runnable on a number of IDEs and plugins. I don’t need to know what anybody else is using to run them, they live with the code and I’m happy.

That said, I’ve seen people on QA do really cool end-to-end tests at load via very approachable scripting on Postman.

There’s lots of room for “to each their own” here.

[–] nebeker@programming.dev 8 points 2 weeks ago

I learned to let you all squabble amongst yourselves and get the answer. Since every question is a duplicate, it stands to reason the question I have has already been answered.

[–] nebeker@programming.dev 43 points 2 weeks ago

A Project Manager just earned their wings.

[–] nebeker@programming.dev 7 points 4 months ago

Let’s all just wait for the new versions of languages, frameworks and operating systems. LLMs won’t have been trained on those and won’t have answers, people not asking each other online will generate no answers to train on.

Let’s read and train on docs, right? Yeah, right.

[–] nebeker@programming.dev 2 points 5 months ago

I’ve seen some very excited sponsor spots for them on YouTube. CDNs often make ads load faster than videos, so who knows what kind of innovations they could be financing. All of them perfectly privacy preserving, of course…

[–] nebeker@programming.dev 23 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Thanks, I was confused about why the helix editor might need screen sharing. Haha.

[–] nebeker@programming.dev 2 points 6 months ago

Sure, it’s:

123 Mulberry '); DROP TABLE Deliveries;--

[–] nebeker@programming.dev 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I love how the documentation is in the actual .h file and the read me is a mere formality.

I’m disappointed I didn’t get this as a floppy in the mail.

[–] nebeker@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago

Isn’t that the point of languages like Snap?

[–] nebeker@programming.dev 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

A good reminder that composition is a useful concept.

[–] nebeker@programming.dev 2 points 8 months ago

I mean, if you want your prints to be asynchronous you’re looking for trouble to begin with.

The previous statement is a joke.

[–] nebeker@programming.dev 1 points 9 months ago

Ah, yes: weaponizing cybersecurity requirements to trick - I mean “motivate” - higher management to do things “right.”

view more: next ›