nitefox

joined 1 year ago
[–] nitefox@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

Yeah like, lol

[–] nitefox@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nono, Americans made peace with the natives!

[–] nitefox@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

That’s truly naive. The problem isn’t the man but that all the judiciary systems are in hand of people who clearly want to dismantle the democratic system

[–] nitefox@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Remember when they put some offers for education which was a shitty discount for one month of subscription?

[–] nitefox@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Dragon age origins

[–] nitefox@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

The civilians.

[–] nitefox@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because the actual calculations aren’t done by the client but the server, or they should be

[–] nitefox@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Because FOSS stands for both free software and people’s freedom. No one exists without a government except for external forces that are stronger than the government itself (lobbying is a way to strong arm a government), but this is another matter entirely.

FOSS organisations should exist outside a government because governments are easily corruptible, which is has happened again and again throughout history and is slowly happening right now. And obeying the law not to be thrown in jail is a nice argument, yes, and a shitty one at that: imagine how good would be a German citizen to abide to the government rule during the Nazi period. This doesn’t mean either that they shouldn’t follow any laws, but that, much like any international organisation, they should be international laws agreed on by multiple nations.

Which is essentially the crux of the matter: as long as FOSS projects work within the framework of a government (the US), the project can be easily hijacked, turned into something that goes against people interests. What are the people interests? In short, the minimum denominator is equality, freedom to speak, a right to privacy.

If FOSS projects do have to follow a government’s laws, then contributing to one is free work for corporations: laws can be changed and a democratic society can turn into a non-democratic entity, with laws that restrict the freedom of its citizens; in EU they try to pass a “chat control” law to make cryptography useless [by adding a back door] and while I believe it won’t pass no doubt it’s a worrisome sign. At the end of the day who would benefit the most from FOSS but companies, which do so already?

And to reiterate: sometime it’s better to be thrown in prison than to send someone else to their death

[–] nitefox@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Law aren’t always right and governments don’t always do the best neither for the world nor for its citizens. Open source projects and corporations shouldn’t rely on any government, they shouldn’t do the biddings on governments — either “good” or “bad” — and act in people best interests.

Of course this is a pipe dream and what we got is more free work for companies with none the benefits

[–] nitefox@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Yes. If FOSS projects bend the knee to shitty laws just because “they are the law”, then FOSS is free labor for corporations with no gains for the people.

[–] nitefox@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

Obviously but so if the current storage gets corrupted /destroyed, there is no way to restore all that data?

 

I understand if they stopped printing new blu rays / DVDs, but it’s outrageous and disappointing I can’t just buy the digital edition.

Is there an actual reason companies do this? Do they hate money or what?

 

We are in a very funny situation where I just spent two weeks fixing FE bugs and there are so many left. I asked to add integration tests but the answer was “no”, cause we can’t test the UI and all of that.

So the proposed solution was to be more careful, except I’m careful but testing whole website parts or the whole website is not feasible. What can I do?

view more: next ›