nudnyekscentryk

Doesn't Google drive do this?

It's a common convention for chapters to start on the right page, check a physical book

Allegedly, Tusk's response to his protégé losing presidential election to a far-right gangster is making a universally disliked far-right lawyer his Secretary of Justice to replace a mediocre minister, but popular human rights activist. So even worse

I got what I deserve? And what is that? Nothing will change and nothing would change if the other guy won. It's a stalemate

If all you know about the two parties who have been ruling Poland for the past 20 years is that one of them doesn't "beat the gays" then I don't think you should be judging our individual voting strategies.

If my choice is right wing (which will empower the right wing government I don't support) or far right (which will fight the right wing government I don't support) then the choice is nonexistent

See my edit

Quite the opposite. See my comment above

I want public healthcare — which neither candidates supports. Trzaskowskis party literally proposed to reduce the healthcare budget by 20bln like a month ago

I want marriage equality — which neither candidate supports. Trzaskowski is said to be in favour but he never said it straigh up and he vocally opposes same-sex adoption.

I want affordable housing — which neither candidate supports. Both parties similarly had their housing programmes which caused the market prices to soar and opposed public housing.

I want ecology — both candidates oppose nuclear power and Trzaskowskis party literally cut public forestry budget and increased the deforestation rate

I want the church to shut up and stop stealing public money — Trzaskowskis party, despite being called "anticlerical" gave the 20% increase of the Church Budget in 2025. Their original promise was to reduce it to 0.

I want a reasonable migration policy — both candidates' parties use migrants as scapegoats and support limiting asylum laws.

I want access to abortion — which Nawrocki opposes; Trzaskowski himself supports it, but some of his party and majority of his coalition doesn't and will never vote for it

Both candidates are shit in their own way

I want public healthcare — which neither candidates supports. Trzaskowskis party literally proposed to reduce the healthcare budget by 20bln like a month ago

I want marriage equality — which neither candidate supports. Trzaskowski is said to be in favour but he never said it straigh up and he vocally opposes same-sex adoption.

I want affordable housing — which neither candidate supports. Both parties similarly had their housing programmes which caused the market prices to soar and opposed public housing.

I want ecology — both candidates oppose nuclear power and Trzaskowskis party literally cut public forestry budget and increased the deforestation rate

I want the church to shut up and stop stealing public money — Trzaskowskis party, despite being called "anticlerical" gave the 20% increase of the Church Budget in 2025. Their original promise was to reduce it to 0.

I want a reasonable migration policy — both candidates' parties use migrants as scapegoats and support limiting asylum laws.

I want access to abortion — which Nawrocki opposes; Trzaskowski himself supports it, but some of his party and majority of his coalition doesn't and will never vote for it

Both candidates are shit in their own way

my understanding is the that green line represents the linear relation of salary to knowledge which OP would consider fair and just. therefore the part where red line is above the green one means people who earn below average are overpaid for their knowledge and professional contribution. and similarly, the part where the red line is below the green one means people who earn above average are underpaid