Aren't they Ex-Emoloyees? Oh shit, sorry, they meant Twitter employees. My bad.
odelik
joined 1 year ago
Yes, and it depends on the article, source, title, and body context how that article goes.
But how does any of that have anything to to do with this article?
How did you even come to this bad of a conclusion?
Vance was too young to be VP in 2016 thankfully.
Maybe having legal representation on your campaign that does all the legal work like this is incredibly important instead of relying on an unaffiliated clerk? I expect any candidate I would vote for to be able to navigate electoral process effectively by having a competent team. This is the inverview process, and they're failing at it.
And no, the parties didn't set these rules up. These rules were set up by each state, and each state varies on the rules and requirements.
This seems like a brilliant feature to roll out as they're getting investigated by the DOJ for being a monopoly.
If you're wondering why you're getting down voted:
You threw out a straw man argument, and one that doesn't even make sense on top of that.
This shouldn't be our responsibility to "fix".
It isn't? I've been using the term since I picked up my first Android phone in 2010 and there were side-loaded apps everywhere. Hell, you used to have to side-load the Amazon Store app. And that was all just "download this apk and install it" Workflows.
Don't chaff your stick.
As my grandmother used to tell me, "Your hands are dry, go lotion them up sonny."
view more: next ›
That's some major logical fallacy stuff that you've got spinning in your head over there. It's also not the first time I've seen you make conclusions based off logical fallacies too. Please, please, please, do yourself a favor and do some studying on logical fallacies and public speaking. It'll do you wonders on effectively communicating and reducing your negative outcomes.
And for the record.
I believe in the idea of third parties. I will vote for serious third party candidates that have done the real work of getting out there and recognized for their platform and constituents in down ballot elections (as long as those platforms align with me). However, I am not going to vote for any current third party in a presidential election since barely any of them have done the down ballot work to make them even possible from being serious presidential candidates. So I will vote for harm reduction, because my life & lifestyle doesn't have the benefit of surviving another Trump presidency.
Lastly.
Not everything is about you. Somehow you made this post that was unrelated to you or third parties about you and your third party interests. I hope you can see how that could annoy people in this community and make you come off as disengenous with ulterior motives at worst or unstable and self-absorbed at best.