odelik

joined 1 year ago
[–] odelik@lemmy.today 41 points 2 weeks ago (18 children)

I think the bigger issue here is the indiscriminate obvious trolling.

The fact that it took "bad judgment" and not the reading between the lines for their sealioning and bad faith arguments and faux "friend" comments points towards the need for strengthening our community standards.

Allowing people to come in and troll under the guise of "I'm following the rules lolololol" makes the mods look like rubes.

[–] odelik@lemmy.today 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Didn't you say that you couldn't vote for who you wanted to vote for a while back? All while wringing your hands about Democrat censorship because your party couldn't be assed to properly register and fulfill the requirements for appearing on the ballot?

Pepperidge Farm Remembers.

So, if you couldn't vote for your third party candidate, who did you vote for?

[–] odelik@lemmy.today 4 points 2 weeks ago

Didn't you say that you couldn't vote for who you wanted to vote for a while back? All while wringing your hands about Democrat censorship because your party couldn't be assed to properly register and fulfill the requirements for appearing on the ballot?

Pepperidge Farm Remembers.

So, if you couldn't vote for your third party candidate, who did you vote for?

[–] odelik@lemmy.today 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I fully expect that "gaining" we're seeing will shift as reputable pollsters release updated polls this week and drown out the ring-wing polls that flooded the data the last 2 weeks.

[–] odelik@lemmy.today 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You do know that the electronic vote counts are audited, right?

There's a process to validate that the machines are counting correctly.

[–] odelik@lemmy.today 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Is that farmer flannel or grunge flannel?

[–] odelik@lemmy.today 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yes, and?

"Highly masculine" comes off as "toxic masculinity".

Having to parade your manliness and let people know you're "so manly" isn't a sign of insecurity at all.

It's like those guys that are "so masculine" that they don't wipe their asses cus it's gay or something.

[–] odelik@lemmy.today 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

That's a laughable bad take.

The left, known for picking apart their candidates and platforms and fucking themselves by letting perfect the enemy of good repeatedly being called out as "cult-like".

I'm voting for Harris. But lemme tell you, I've got issues with her. Especially her history as "pro cop".

The thing is, many people on the left vote for "harm reduction". We know there's better candidates out there, but we're stuck with what we've got in the FPTP voting we have.

Objectively, voting for Harris will cause the least harm in this election.

Especially if our alternative is a ratfucking tyrant that wants to be a "dictator", wants to "ban protests", revoke the broadcast licenses of media outlets critical of him & his party, would authorize Israel to wipe out Gaza with our direct support of our troops, would consolidate wealth to the top, and is openly working with the deranged likes of a man that dreams of making his workers indentured servants and would push the USA to reflect apartheid South Africa to relive the glory his father did.

[–] odelik@lemmy.today 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

WTF is "Blue MAGA"?

I don't see people on the left holding onto what was and getting stuck on reverting to times of old. Preventing the forward march of changing times.

[–] odelik@lemmy.today 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Madison Square Garden is a private event venue. They can accept or deny anybody they like. Their acceptance, or rejection, of a political candidate will also have nothing-to-fucking-do with "democracy" or free speech.

[–] odelik@lemmy.today 52 points 1 month ago (24 children)

Our biggest offender would, but they're currently serving a 3-day ban for Sealioning (public mod logs are awesome).

[–] odelik@lemmy.today 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Ughhhhhhhhh. Sorry, but I need to rant.

Those fuckers are so fucking sensationalist. They use the same simple-mined tactics as right-wing propaganda mills. A 20 minute video of theirs could be condensed into 5 without those tactics and actually do far more to push forward their "law based coverage".

I quickly put them in the "not worth the sensationalist propaganda" bucket after watching a handful of their videos

view more: ‹ prev next ›