I’m saying an accusation can be made by anyone, and does not automatically constitute fact. Its presence in the file doesn’t mean the claim was substantiated.
ohulancutash
joined 10 months ago
That’s not what the Epstein files are. They’re literally any paperwork related to him, even the tips from kooks. Some reaches the level of evidence, most is cruft.
John Oliver did an episode on her recently. That’s probably online somewhere.
Its a fully substantiated story about knowing US complicity in human rights abuses, that was pulled last minute because the government chose not to comment.
Becauae when it was nationalised, the British car industry was poor-quality, unimaginative, and unreliable.
What makes you think a wheel thief bought their tools?
Another reminder that all soldiers are dangerous psychopaths.
There will be a whole new class of historian and archivist dedicated to sniffing out slop.
Oh well, if striking is inconvenient then by all means stand by and let this all happen.
The Epstein files are just the files generated by agencies in relation with Epstein. They don’t on their own imply relevance, involvement or knowledge of criminality or any wrongdoing for people depicted in the photos.
view more: next ›
To shift blame? For attention? Mental illness? We don’t know enough of the context. Was it investigated? What was the outcome? Was it deemed credible?