otter

joined 1 year ago
[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Oh? You feel like gracing us all with specifics of these "somewhat useful" "super generalizations", bud? That would be generous.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 month ago (3 children)

When the only wheels available are variations of the same ha-ha-fuck-you, maybe a new wheel is the best option. πŸ€·πŸΌβ€β™‚οΈ

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 month ago

Too little, too late. Fuck Sony.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 month ago (6 children)

As super generalizations go, I guess.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Maybe it's the sample size being a bit lacking? I'm no expert, but IIRC, 1k is the bare minimum for such, and only 871 of those surveyed are relevant to the results β€” or, am I missing something?

The latest Reuters/Ipsos poll surveyed 1,029 U.S. adults online, nationwide, including 871 registered voters. Among these, 785 were considered the most likely to turn out on Election Day. Among these likely voters, Harris led 50% to 44%, though similar to her lead among all registered voters, her advantage was only five points when using unrounded figures.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Oh, good. Now that they've done their damage for months/years? Great timing, CCCP. Bravo.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Adam Conover? "Funny"? ^Thafuq ^are ^you ^on?

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, it was a rhetorical comment on your understanding of how that process works at all, no offense.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago

Here's hoping something works.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦πŸ€˜πŸ½

view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί