pooperNickel

joined 1 year ago
[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

Doubt it. The campaign you've embarked here would not make much sense for you do engage in if you were going to do so.

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Copypasta never fails

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

Great news!

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

the moral conscious thing to do is to prevent the people that are currently killing them, continue killing them

Yes, the morally conscious thing to do, is to hand the reins to someone who has vowed to help the killing go faster. /s

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

If you really want to avoid a Trump win, supporting a viable alternative outside the two-party system is the only way to push the conversation forward.

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

I don’t care if he wins

This is literally everyone's point who criticizes you

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

there’s a functional difference between what you feel and the reality of voting.

And this is the crux, which this user will never acknowledge. I don't believe they're coming to the conversation in good faith

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

A normal person would've said "careful about putting conditions on voting" or something. Not you, somehow it's supposed to not be sus AF that you're raging on about fascism and the constitution. It's an understandable sentiment that you could've talked through but what you chose instead is to demonize the sentiment and ignore the dude's point while insisting it's a dog whistle. And now you're doing it to me. No conversation is possible here. However it's clearer than ever that your priority is defending uneducated votes above all, like that's a worthy cause lol

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I had it right the first message when I said INSUFFERABLE

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The reason for amendments is that conditions change. I can quote basic logic all day but I grow tired of this bullshit.

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

We all know the reasoning for that wording. Discrimination and such. We've made plenty of amendments in the past. Do you call those unconstitutional? You're very much overreacting to this very specific idea which btw practically no one throws around. But I understand it completely. It is not even in the same ballpark as fascism, that's ridiculous bullshit and the wrong thing to hyper focus on. We have a problem with people not understanding what they are even doing. That is something to try to address and calling that fascism is absolutely and plainly ridiculous af

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

Practically no one would agree with you that what was said was fascist or taking rights away or any of these other scary words you're throwing out. Unless they are trying hard to justify third party voting.

view more: ‹ prev next ›