pooperNickel

joined 1 year ago
[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (13 children)

Yes you're right. There is no law against you starting an account to post a bunch of third party candidate shit right before the election. Therefore it cannot be suspicious.

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (15 children)

Weird. No one asked you for proof. It's obviously suspect that you suddenly appeared from nowhere and apparently spend half your day on this weird canvassing.

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Your argument that voting third-party may lead to the least ethical candidate winning, assumes that people should always choose the lesser of two evils,

No one buys this. Their argument assumes outcomes matter and that's literally all it assumes.

All your argument assumes is that the outcome is not something anyone can force you to care about as it is not your problem. Which is a garbage lie.

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago (17 children)

I don't think there's any reason to believe you're even American

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you aren't pretending a third party can win, you're either saying you don't know how American presidential elections run or you're admitting to letting trump essentially have your vote.

Also nice try but none of my comments here have been removed lol

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Still trying to pretend that third parties can get anywhere near winning? Still pretending that your vote both counts as a message to say "f you Democrats" but simultaneously doesn't count as an outcome (trump winning is not my fault)?

"Untrue" is not "uncivil" btw

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Please state the ways I've not been civil. Exact quotes only

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (7 children)

You're obviously mad. In multiple senses of the word. Hence the endless trolling from a brand new account that all gets heavily downvoted

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago (9 children)

Don't be mad that someone hit the nail on the head so perfectly. Nothing you have said slightly takes away from the facts they pointed out, comrade.

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, maybe. Doesn't sound attractive to me though, there are already several ways to authenticate which work fine.

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I mean how would this work though, even assuming that technology hurdle is cleared (definitely doubting it, a slightly dark room can totally hose a cell phone photo)?

The Twitter app has to request camera use and then ask the user to do that. What possible benefit would there be for the user?

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

How exactly would a phone camera get a clear image of your retina? I very much doubt anything like this is possible but maybe I'm missing something

view more: ‹ prev next ›