prex

joined 1 year ago
[–] prex@aussie.zone 5 points 2 weeks ago

Just do the minimum.
No one wants to read a 10 paragraph AI generated treatise.

[–] prex@aussie.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

I sorted this thread by controversial and was disappointed.
You guys are so... civilised.

[–] prex@aussie.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I dreamt we were out of milk / had a flat tyre / forgot to pay some bill.
Super annoying.

Edit: these were seperate dreams

[–] prex@aussie.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago

It's never a mistake, it's performance art.

[–] prex@aussie.zone 5 points 3 weeks ago

Q👏E👏D👏

[–] prex@aussie.zone 67 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)
[–] prex@aussie.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Sigh

I think the point of gibberish is that it is not language.

Thats why imagination and creativity is required - no?

I feel like I'm talking to an llm right now. too many words.

[–] prex@aussie.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

My point is that if we turn up our gibberish dial now then at least our llms will be learning the wrong thing & we have some control.

There is still a lot of understanding that we do automatically that an llm will never do. I still 4eckon I can spot gibberish better than an llm & I would like to keep it that way

Or we just give up. As you can see I have mostly given up.

[–] prex@aussie.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

OTOH people are better at filtering out, or at least recognising gibberish than LLMs. At least for now.

You are right about the fediverse being used for training content though.

I'm curious about the levels of bot posting compared to xitter etc. A low rate here would make it even more attractive to prevent model collapse.

[–] prex@aussie.zone 3 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

This is the correct answer.

The only only solution is to deeply integrate the gibberish into everything we post.

I, for one, welcome our insane (unsane?) overlords.

[–] prex@aussie.zone 1 points 1 month ago

True.

I tend to use ZZ it ZQ instead. Its been a while.

view more: ‹ prev next ›