quackerjo

joined 3 weeks ago
[–] quackerjo@lemmy.wtf -2 points 3 days ago

Of everyone this administration is victimizing, this is one man I do not care about.

If he was the only person they were persecuting, I would probably feel a lot differently.

So while I'm very sad for what this means for our country, I do find a little pleasure in watching an unjust persecution of someone who at least deserves bad things happening to them, because he is in large part to blame for this.

Truly a bittersweet taste of irony.

[–] quackerjo@lemmy.wtf 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's currently in QA as we speak... Slated to go live Q1 2026.

[–] quackerjo@lemmy.wtf 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

This a guaranteed to be a gigantic shit show that will become an unmitigated disaster, if they don't end up abandoning it early on.

I can't fucking wait.

Imagine these morons going on a tear and firing 20% of the bureaucrats at the Pentagon.

The majority will be fired based on false positives and office politics. Those rounds of firings will then cause so many of their former colleagues to start leaking information, in addition to the leakers that passed the polygraph.

I'm seriously giddy at the thought.

[–] quackerjo@lemmy.wtf 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I'm not a licensed math surgeon, but I think your math is wildly optimistic in favor of Microsoft due to how the subscription totals are actually distributed per price tier.

I don't doubt that they did a lot of math to figure out an acceptable level of churn for this change, I just don't think it's nearly as generous and wide as you're calculating.

There probably is a very real churn limit that they're trying to avoid, and my hunch is that there exists a breaking point that could be hit with an aggressive and sustained boycott / cancellation spree, but again, I'm not a math surgeon so I could be wrong. That's just my gut feeling.

[–] quackerjo@lemmy.wtf 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Searxng still has to send out queries and receive results, but yes, it's one of the better options, and I mentioned it in another comment.

Regardless, my beef with Google search isn't specifically privacy related, it's that in exchange for giving up some privacy, I get no useful results in return, just slop.

DDG isn't perfect, but it substantially better than most of the available alternatives.

Externally hosted search engines have to make money, you'll either exchange some privacy, or some cash, in exchange for results.

[–] quackerjo@lemmy.wtf 18 points 6 days ago

I mostly use DDG, but sometimes searx.

Startpage returns similarly dubious results as Google, but with the built-in proxy functionality and no clutter, so it's also in the rotation.

[–] quackerjo@lemmy.wtf 96 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (36 children)

I'm actually surprised people still heavily use Google search.

Not for some tech snob snark reason, but because it's unusable.

I only ever go back to Google if I'm really desperate, and I can't recall the last time it ever delivered me a result I considered useful.

It's all SEO AI spam, and those are the web results Google returns only after all of its own AI and shopping bloat.

Completely useless.