r_deckard

I'm fed up with gmail requiring an "app-specific" password for Outlook. Not some crusty old 2007 version, the 2021 LTSC version.

Doesn't require an app-specific password from its own app on android, oh no.

What about the Stay-puft^tm^ Marshmallow Man?

ffmpeg - www.deb-multimedia.org . I edit podcast videos for distribution to subscribers. High-quality video produces very large files but if they're only going to be watched on laptops, tablets, and phones, I can throw away a lot of bits without noticeably affecting quality on a phone screen.

And nothing does that better or faster than ffmpeg.

OS400 (IBM i)

I didn't say it was a bad thing, I wanted to know about some of the broader implications, e.g. govt ownership doesn't remove legal obligations. I doubt the govt could continue to offer service under the previous T&C, some sections would need revision. And Starlink's T&C are slightly different in some countries, as are the operating conditions. Some countries who are nominally friendly with Starlink/SpaceX to allow ground stations, POPs, etc, might not be so keen on the US govt controlling things.

These are just some of the things that popped into my head when I read the article.

And the international customers, what about them? The ground stations, POPs, and terminals in other countries, hmmmm?

There's a lot of copper pairs left underground. Many hundreds of thousands of kilometres of it. Use it as a pull-through for fibre-optic bundles, and everyone can have gigabit internet.

Seriously though, there'll come a time when that underground obsolete copper will become economic to retrieve.

Heh. My batteries are flooded lead-acid, all 1320ah of 'em. No copper guilt here.

YT becoming shittier and shittier with ads is why I've changed to downloaders instead. No ads.

So, Blade Runner was a future documentary ? And then Blade Runner 2049?

I've got two piholes running on the home network, and they are both DHCP servers - with different ranges, i.e. #1 serves 192.168.0.11 - 100, and #2 serves 101-200. Each uses option 6 to specify DNS servers, and they both reference each other. It doesn't matter if one goes down because each client will have the both piholes specified as DNS servers. I've never had an address conflict problem.