I would have assumed that everyone that was going back to the office would have done so a while ago ... like in 2022.
So who do you believe? Who do you listen to?
That is really up to you. Whomever your personal morals align with the most. Or don't listen to anyone and just rely on your own morals.
Basing your morals on "god" is just kicking the can down the road. First of all ... which god? There is hundreds of them. And even if people agree on the god, they disagree on the interpretation of the morals (for some reason gods tend to be super ambiguous and imprecise). So you're still left with the questions "So who do you believe? Who do you listen to?". It answers nothing.
Really all you did was to restrict potential sources of morality to mythical fiction.
... who talked about fight Club?
Depends on who you ask. If you ask the Nazis they'll say it's ok. The people they took over would probably disagree.
Morals only exist by consensus. If enough people agree something is moral, it practically is. They are an idea, not something that actually exists in nature.
Conditioning. It's literally one of the last food I would want with alcohol.
I've been in and out FRA a couple of times this year, which is a pretty big airport. Absolutely didn't need to be an hour early, probably gonna cut it to 30 mins next time. Boarding takes longer than any security line.
Yeah, but this is about Europe. We know that US air travel is fucked. You have to take your shoes off, lol.
Where are these airports with hours of security checks? I've never taken more than 15 minutes.
I don't know and I don't want to find out.
I must have gone through all the options twice, but can't find it. Not a super big deal, but since you already have the library button below, it's a bit redundant and unnecessarily taking up space.
Whether or not something is ok is a moral judgement, so it again depends on who you ask. A nazi will of course think it's ok ... that's probably why they are a nazi. If you asked me personally, I think it's not ok.
Right. But we haven't heard of him in a while, so it's kind of hard to consult with him on moral issues. And his book isn't that comprehensive, contains some rather questionable takes and also is not really keeping up with a lot of more modern moral issues. Not to mention their is hundreds of different versions of the book and there is a lot of disagreement which is the "correct" one. So in the end it's still up to you to decide which interpretation you like best.