riskable

joined 2 years ago
[–] riskable@programming.dev 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This seems more like a story about global warming killing jobs than anything else.

Of course, Trump's obscenely pro-oil stance is very Leopards Eating Faces.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 60 points 1 month ago (4 children)

The entire article reads like a comedy... Of errors. The ICE agents didn't know what they were doing. Didn't know where to go. Didn't have functioning equipment. Didn't know how to use said equipment. Couldn't follow basic instructions (navigation).

Forget the innocent civilian who was pointlessly harassed and detained for a moment: They are clearly wasting US tax dollars, driving around aimlessly, without proper training, accomplishing absolutely nothing.

It is astonishingly clear that ICE is incapable of doing the most basic functions of their job. Better to not even have immigration enforcement at all than this pointless waste of government resources.

This is the clearest demonstration yet that Republicans are completely incapable of governing efficiently. Or even governing at all! If they can't even implement their own Nazi/racist ideals properly, what makes you think they can do something as complicated as balancing the budget or managing a war?

They can't even get villaining right!

[–] riskable@programming.dev 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So basically... There's was no justice for rich people in the past either.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 24 points 1 month ago

Couples that get roped into this hobby often tie the knot.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 7 points 1 month ago

It won't stop until you're 64. The name was prophecy.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They need a modern equivalent for vaping.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

D should be Dookie.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 42 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Analog intelligence.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 15 points 1 month ago

Atoms lettuce break the iceberg.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, "your sick" makes perfect sense because it will become their sick when that employee brings it into work. Everyone can have the sick that way 👍

[–] riskable@programming.dev -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I don't think it's irresponsible to suggest to readers that they can use an AI chatbot to examine any given image to see if it was AI-generated. Even the lowest-performing multi-model chatbots (e.g. Grok and ChatGPT) can do that pretty effectively.

Also: Why stop at one? Try a whole bunch! Especially if you're a reporter working for the BBC!

It's not like they give an answer, "yes: Definitely fake" or "no: Definitely real." They will analyze the image and give you some information about it such as tell-tale signs that an image could have been faked.

But why speculate? Try it right fucking now: Ask ChatGPT or Gemini (the current king at such things BTW... For the next month at least hahaha) if any given image is fake. It only takes a minute or two to test it out with a bunch of images!

Then come back and tell us that's irresponsible with some screenshots demonstrating why.

view more: ‹ prev next ›