rottingleaf

joined 2 years ago
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Funny how yall seem to like it shredded, I prefer half-transparent thin slices on a fat-fat piece of bread.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

I'm more about separation of addressing data and data model from addressing services and service model for storing and processing it, to make those uniform, because in uniformity lies efficiency and redundancy and ability to switch service models, and uniformity inside proprietary services is already achieved, so in this case uniformity works for the people.

I mean, that's probably what you meant, I'm being this specific to fight my own distractions and fuzziness of thought.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Well, in the Soviet example everything was government.

And governments seem to be so excited by the prospects of this "AI" so it's pretty clear that it's still their desire most of all.

EDIT: On telegraph and Panama you are right (btw, it's bloody weird that where it sounds like canal in my language it's usually channel in English, but in the particular case of Panama it's not), but they might perceive this as a similarly important direction. Remember how in 20s and 30s "colonization of space" was dreamed about with new settlements supporting new power bases, mining for resources and growing on Mars and Venus, FTL travel to Sirius, all that. There are some very cool things in Soviet stagnation - those pictures of the future lived longer than in the West against scientific knowledge. So, back to the subject, - "AI" they want to reach is the thing that will allow to generate knowledge and designs like a production line makes chocolate bars. If that is made, the value of intelligent individuals will be tremendously reduced, or so they think. At least of the individuals on the "autistic" side, but not on the "psychopathic" side, because the latter will run things. It's literally a "quantity vs quality" evolutionary battle inside human kinds of diversity, all the distractions around us and the legal mechanisms being fuzzied and undone also fit here. So - for the record, I think quality is on our side even if I'm distracted right now, and sheer quantity thrown at the task doesn't solve complexity of such magnitude, it's a fundamental problem.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world -4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This comment doesn't add anything to the discussion, go fuck yourself

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Middle-East involves plenty of mountainous areas, and the reason many of those are arid is because water, ahem, flows down.

Also in a flat dry desert one can replace pumping water up with raising heavy things up. I think. More wear though.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

You mean when the bubble bursts and there are lots of people who worked on this available on the job market?

I'd expect them to be big data specialists, mostly knowledgeable in Python and matrix operations, narrow optimizations needed there, and not very competitive for other typical tech specialties.

They'll just have to become data analysts, assistants in labs working on things like genome analysis, and so on. Perhaps medical RnD will get a boost due to all the willing slaves, LOL.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (4 children)

They were smart, those oiled fish-eating goatfuckers. So maybe yes, that - and also sortition and ostracism.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Exactly, it's a tool to whitewash decisions. A machine that seemingly does not exactly what it should do. A way to shake off responsibility.

And that it won't ever work right is its best trait for this purpose. They'll be able to blame every transgression or wrong where they are caught on an error in the system, and get away with the rest.

At least unless it's legally equated to using Tarot cards for making decisions affecting lives. That should disqualify the fiend further as a completely inadequate human being, not absolve them of responsibility.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Transatlantic telegraph, I think, was very expensive, or Panama channel projects. Before they were finished to any useful degree.

In this particular case - I don't think it's more expensive than Soviet attempts at turning Kazakh steppe into agricultural land, let alone all the space and defense projects.

It's an ideology-driven effort all right - an idea that you can create an inherently totalitarian technology. Probably caused by the popular (in the 90s and early 00s) belief that the Internet is inherently anti-totalitarian, so there's a need to compensate. Both are wrong.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but with modern technologies where easily done. TLS, markdown-like markup, MIME, prompts for input.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Meshtastic, Briar.

view more: next ›