Company's PR dept saying "we didn't do it" is not proof of anything.
If they're not blocking 3rd party cartridges, why even implement DRM?
Do they have so much extra money that they're developing features they're not planning to use just because they're bored?
Thanks a lot for testing it, really nice to see a mandatory wait after release is not necessary anymore.
That's an optimistic view.
But really, that's just Google being Google.
Even years before the "AI" hype their Assistant kept suddenly losing features that worked perfectly fine before.
The issue seems a bit misrepresented by the dev.
The mentioned section of the privacy policy is true only for the logged in users that have agreed to voluntarily share their data.
Without logging in they don't even store a single cookie on my device.
Ten years is plenty of time to implement a launcher, or at least give a planned timeline
Or to give literally any kind of update, like admitting it was never seriously planned.
I'd like that to be "new", but... It's not exactly the first time this exact thing happened in tech.
And for every year without the inflation adjustment my performance goes down accordingly.
Thanks for the link.
Looks like not really closed-source, but not fully open as the previous printers were.
And the reasoning is the usual, other companies stealing their designs. :/
What is that even supposed to mean?
Aren't you confusing them with Bambu?
Their slicer is based on Prusa's exactly because Prusa isn't doing closed source.
That website actually promotes Firefox, you know. Not sure it fits this thread.
That's a very charitable way of looking at DRM.