seathru

joined 1 year ago
[–] seathru@lemm.ee 0 points 8 months ago

It's one of the messier options but it still works well. The switches in my logitech g604 have been bounce free for over a year now after hosing then down with WD-40. That's longer than any of the warranty replacement mice lasted.

Deoxit leaves a residue, too, that will stain clothes. That residue is what helps the contacts from oxidizing again in the future.

[–] seathru@lemm.ee 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Yeah alcohol works well. WD-40. too.

[–] seathru@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago (6 children)

That is kind of just how non hall effect thumb sticks are. But I've had great luck with Deoxit D5. You have to take apart the controller so you can squirt it directly into the switch itself but as long as it's not a mechanical problem like a weak spring, the Deoxit usually gets it working like new.

[–] seathru@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago

It popped up for me too on their unlimited plan. I clicked the X and went on with my life.

[–] seathru@lemm.ee 17 points 8 months ago

Perhaps they should start a gofundme or something.

[–] seathru@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago

My car insurance went up $1200 this year, which blows my mind. No reason given.

Kind of like jobs. If you stay with the same company for more than a couple years, you're probably doing yourself a disservice.

[–] seathru@lemm.ee 7 points 9 months ago

Same here. Everything worked pretty much right out of the box with Nobara. And my total linux experience in the last decade is running Mint on my work laptop the last 3 months. I tried to switch over to linux gaming in the late 00s, but it was far too much work then. I spent more time getting X3 to work then I ever did playing it. Completely different experience these days.

[–] seathru@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Click the settings gear next to your username in proton mail, then click "all settings" and then "explore other proton plans". If you have a current paid service, the remainder will be credited towards the new purchase.

[–] seathru@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Overly simplistic and assuming you are talking about the US: So you spent 80M making a movie but for whatever reason it never makes it out of production, you never see any return on this investment. But overall this year you made 100M from something else. When you do your taxes, you can "write off" this 80M spent as a loss, so you only have to pay taxes on the remaining 20 million. It doesn't deduct 80M from taxes owed.

[–] seathru@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Usenet is a decentralized network that works very much like the fediverse here. Anything uploaded to one server gets sent out to all the servers; that's why you can log onto lemmy.world and see posts made on say lemm.ee. Likewise something posted to one usenet server gets sent out to all the others. And these servers are being operated by individual entities (again, much like lemmy). Whoever owns the server you're downloading from is having to pay for everything it sends out. Which is why most of the free ones will let you access the text portions but not the file downloads.

A VPN isn't necessary. But you do need a special program to connect to usenet. It's built into a lot of older email clients (thunderbird is a good option).

There's no one single usenet company for the same reason there's no one single lemmy instance. (I'm sure someone has explained it better somewhere else in this post).

[–] seathru@lemm.ee 10 points 9 months ago (4 children)

in the era of free services, why do you still have to pay for Usenet access?

Bandwidth costs money. And usenet isn't collecting and selling your info to recoup those costs like most "free" services. A lot of ISPs do offer free usenet access to customers, albeit somewhat neutered. You can browse the bulletin boards but most of the file downloads are going to be filtered out. That's the part you have to pay for.

[–] seathru@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Is it actually illegal? Has anyone in the US ever been charged for selling digital software they had legally acquired?

view more: next ›