I don't remember this quote, so I went digging and I can't find this in the show. Anyone have a link?
semisimian
joined 8 months ago
Thank you, that was an interesting breakdown. I really appreciate his methodology. I'm going to deep dive into anything he has posted. Though he doesn't come to the same conclusion I do, the takeaway is:
-
Yes, there is noticeable sound loss when converting a 24 bit sample to 16 bit.
-
You can really screw with a 24 bit sample and still have a listenable file, presumably because of the bit depth.
-
Recording and mastering in 24 bit benefits classical music reproduction, and I would argue, any acoustic music reproduction. So, anything with a vocal, drum kit, acoustic guitar, etc.
Since the video is about dither specifically, he does conclude that mastering to 16 bit gives the technician a sturdier product when played back on the myriad of modern equipment we have. It's arguable, sure, but since this an audiophile sub...
Really though, thanks for posting the video. Deep dive in 3, 2....
That's why I didn't mention the sample rate. You aren't going to get really anything back increasing to 96 khz. But I promise you increasing the bit depth leads to a noticeable change in the perception of the recording. You're not going to get anything from modern pop since it's compressed to hell and back, but find a good recording of an album you've listened to a lot and find some decent, wired headphones and try an A/B of a 16 and 24 bit mix. You'll see what I mean.
"considering that 16-bit, 48kHz exceeds the threshold of human hearing even for “golden ears,”
Um, no it doesn't. 16-Bit dynamic range is 96 decibels, 24-bit is 144 decibels. 96 cuts off quite a bit of an average person's hearing range. A/B a 16 and 24 bit recording and you can hear it easily over even modest headphones.
Hey man, let's take some poorly written beat poetry and put it over mediocre guitar compositions. Then we can take a talented keyboardist but make him play the shittiest sounding electric organ. And we can make sure the recording makes it all sound like a cat and some tin cans in a dryer.
I know what you mean, but I've never seen a map like this and I am grateful for the perspective.
Phone manufacturers know where you touch your screen the most often and put their shittiest apps in that spot so you accidentally engage. It's the only reason I open up Google's AI, because I did it by accident.
Phillip Seymour Hoffman. He can come back and do anything at any time. He had so much more to give and so much more to receive. God damn shame.
I'd love to see Gilda Radner come back for Weekend Update.
Annie Wersching should still be playing the Borg queen.
"The car is cheap because money is free" is what the article is basically saying: China provides no-interest loans to EV manufacturers.
I don't know if this link will work, but Moody's just released a statement that almost half of US states are in a recession. Closer Look on GPB had a Moody's economist on their podcast today:
Episode webpage: https://omny.fm/shows/closer-look-with-rose-scott/moodys-analytics-says-georgia-nearing-a-recession
"I do not see coincidence, I see providence!"
view more: next ›
DINO? LINO? One of those is correct.
Nolan's Batman film repeated a line that didn't land with me at the time but I have since understood: "it's not who you are, it's what you do that defines you."
At the time, I thought myself a temporarily embarrassed progressive, thinking all these good thoughts and waiting for my sleeper-cell handler to activate me. I'm a good person, I am ready to do good when the need arises, as long as I have nothing else scheduled that day.
But the malaise of the socially progressive 90s lulled me (and other Gen Xers) into a false optimism that things were just going to get better on their own. Our brains were also cooked by decades of deregulation propaganda. And TVs were getting bigger and cheaper, so who were we to complain?
Weiss is the next generation of this detached ideology. She's been simmering in absurdism and pageantry so long that I don't think she has a handle on what she really wants to do. I'm not excusing her behavior, but I can't devine a coherent platform for her. I'm not sure any of her contemporaries actually have one, either. Just for the grift? It doesn't make them less dangerous, but hopefully it makes them less intimidating for those of us who have felt the tap on the shoulder to enlist.
In conclusion, she sucks, she says inane things. Don't be surprised but also don't roll your eyes and move on. Find what you can do, no matter how small, and do it. You will instantly be steps ahead of the performative competition.